{
  "id": 2086671,
  "name": "WALTERS AND WALKER vs. JOHN A. BREEDER",
  "name_abbreviation": "Walters v. Breeder",
  "decision_date": "1855-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "64",
  "last_page": "64",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "3 Jones 64"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "48 N.C. 64"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 121,
    "char_count": 1410,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.389,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.522642630739408e-07,
      "percentile": 0.811653497945247
    },
    "sha256": "1d733f11ca52ec5ef676c7b499d3dc9d3b9b6a27c485d63fd5a338562c654342",
    "simhash": "1:5ae9dcd58edcfd94",
    "word_count": 242
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:04:13.305795+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WALTERS AND WALKER vs. JOHN A. BREEDER."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pearson, J.\nWe think it settled, that a citizen of South Carolina may sue another citizen of that State, in the courts of our State, upon a personal cause of action originating in South\u2019 Carolina. Miller v. Black, 2 Jones\u2019 Rep. 341.\nThe distinction suggested in the argument that, in this case, both the parties are residents of the same State, can make no difference.\nThere is error. The plaintiff was entitled to a judgment of respondeat ouster.\nPer Curiam.\nJudgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pearson, J. Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Shepherd, for plaintiffs.",
      "MeDugald and Troy, for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WALTERS AND WALKER vs. JOHN A. BREEDER.\nCitizens of other States may sue one another in the courts of this State, on personal causes of action.\nAction of assumpsit, tried before his Honor, Judge Ellis, at the Pali Term, 1855, of Columbus Superior Court.\nThe defendant pleaded in abatement to the jurisdiction of the court, that the plaintiffs were citizens of the district of Charleston, in the State of South Carolina, at the time of the issuing of this writ, and that he, defendant, was a citizen of the district of Marion, in the same State, and that neither of them did, at the time, or before, or since, reside in the county of Columbus in this State, when this suit was brought.\nTo this plea the plaintiffs demurred.\nOn argument of the case below, his Honor sustained the plea in abatement, and gave judgment for defendant, from which judgment plaintiffs appealed.\nShepherd, for plaintiffs.\nMeDugald and Troy, for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0064-01",
  "first_page_order": 72,
  "last_page_order": 72
}