{
  "id": 11275123,
  "name": "Elizabeth Wynne vs. Mishaw Always",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wynne v. Always",
  "decision_date": "1804-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "38",
  "last_page": "39",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Mur. 38"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "5 N.C. 38"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 109,
    "char_count": 1181,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.341,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.676830387708631e-08,
      "percentile": 0.355124565177352
    },
    "sha256": "6680a7693b0ac874e8e117f0af5505440a254aa084d101012bf55b32480843bb",
    "simhash": "1:5abf1e54180bc2fb",
    "word_count": 213
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:43:58.494236+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Elizabeth Wynne vs. Mishaw Always."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "By the Court.\u2014\nGuardianship in socage departed with tenure in socage. The court is uot bound to appoint the next \u00aef bin, or the person chosen by a minor $b,ove fourteen years of age ; but by virtue of the act of assembly may and ought, to appoint that person who, in their discretion, they believe will best execute the duties of the appointment.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "By the Court.\u2014"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Elizabeth Wynne vs. Mishaw Always.\nAppeal to Newbern Superior Court, on a guardianship. r\u00a1r,j(e questions reserved for the opinion of this court were \u00ab Whether the choice of a guardian made by a person between the ages of fourteen and twenty-one years, is absolute so as to preclude the exorcise of the judgment of the county court, on any point not relative to the security to be given?\u201d If this question be determined in the negative \u201c Whether the court, who rejects the choice, is not to give leave to the minor to nominate a more proper person ?\u201d or \u00ab Whether the court may not appoint the person to them most proper?\u201d\nIf the court are of opinion, that the county court may appoint without regarding the choice of the infant, or offering him a second nomination, the judgment to be for the defendant, otherwise for the plaintiff."
  },
  "file_name": "0038-01",
  "first_page_order": 34,
  "last_page_order": 35
}