{
  "id": 11276560,
  "name": "The State v. Whitsenhunt",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Whitsenhunt",
  "decision_date": "1809-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "287",
  "last_page": "287",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Mur. 287"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "5 N.C. 287"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 42,
    "char_count": 585,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.451,
    "sha256": "4fb5aa3b3ba8cc148481b61b8d6d6b5898eddd1e913f5b3d847e535e5cf394f8",
    "simhash": "1:ffaf5b17baf0eafd",
    "word_count": 109
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:43:58.494236+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The State v. Whitsenhunt."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "By the Coukt.\nThe Solicitor for the State is entitled to a fee on a sdre fadas against a delinquent juror, in all cases where costs are given against such juror. Where the juror is discharged without costs, the Solicitor is not entitled to a fee.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "By the Coukt."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The State v. Whitsenhunt.\n{- From Lincoln.\nSolicitor for the State entitled to a fee in case of a scire facias v. a dei linquent juror, in all cases where costs are given against such juror.\nThe question in this case was, whether the Solicitor for the State was entitled to a fee in the case of a sdre, fadas against a delinquent juror ?"
  },
  "file_name": "0287-01",
  "first_page_order": 267,
  "last_page_order": 267
}