{
  "id": 2090172,
  "name": "THE ATLANTIC BANK OF NEW YORK v. SIMEON FRANKFORD",
  "name_abbreviation": "Atlantic Bank v. Frankford",
  "decision_date": "1867-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "199",
  "last_page": "200",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Phil. 199"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "61 N.C. 199"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 129,
    "char_count": 1582,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.471,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.3117374745173627e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6246250264011531
    },
    "sha256": "61598966b6f5f8625b73fc8b021d63f8baa95c8b2a16b6c89184920188c9733a",
    "simhash": "1:c8e800b32a6bfcf8",
    "word_count": 269
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:18:16.220923+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "THE ATLANTIC BANK OF NEW YORK v. SIMEON FRANKFORD."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Reade, J.\nThe plaintiff\u2019s counsel moved to amend the affidavit by striking from it certain words, and the court allowed the motion.\nIt does not appear that it was sworn to again after it was thus amended. It was then no affidavit at all, and the plaintiff could not be convicted of perjury, if, as amended, it be false. The case stands then as if there were no affidavit. An original attachment, without an affidavit to support it, is irregular, and may be quashed on motion.\nThere is error in the refusal to quash.\nPer Curiam. Judgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Reade, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Boyden and Bailey, for the plaintiff.",
      "Blaclcmer and McGorlde, for the defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "THE ATLANTIC BANK OF NEW YORK v. SIMEON FRANKFORD.\nAn affidavit amended by order of the court must be re-sworn to afteiamendment, or it will be considered as no affidavit.\nOriginal Attachment, before Buxton, J., at Fall Term, 1866, of Rowan Superior Court, upon a motion to quash.\nThe view taken bj the court renders it necessary to state only that the plaintiff was a corporation, chartered in New York, and had sued out an attachment agaidst the effects of the defendant, making affidavit that the latter \u201cis a nonresident of the State, or so absconds or conceals himself,\u201d &c. This attachment was returned to Spring Term, 1866, of Rowan Superior Court, and at Fall Term, 1866, upon motion by the plaintiff, the words, \u201c is a non-resident of this State,\u201d above, were stricken out.\nBefore the amendment was allowed, the defendant had moved to quash the attachment, and afteiq such allowance, this motion was overruled. Thereupon the defendant appealed.\nBoyden and Bailey, for the plaintiff.\nBlaclcmer and McGorlde, for the defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0199-01",
  "first_page_order": 207,
  "last_page_order": 208
}