{
  "id": 2090076,
  "name": "JOHN W. ISLER v. B. F. WHITFIELD",
  "name_abbreviation": "Isler v. Whitfield",
  "decision_date": "1868-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "493",
  "last_page": "494",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Phil. 493"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "61 N.C. 493"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "2 Jones, 327",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Jones",
      "case_ids": [
        8682481
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/47/0327-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 221,
    "char_count": 3378,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.434,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.7492960360752035e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2979602285693104
    },
    "sha256": "238fecc7697965af209b662051664080fa1ed73c002e0bff5c45fbe018271e31",
    "simhash": "1:a179ec220098ef85",
    "word_count": 576
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:18:16.220923+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JOHN W. ISLER v. B. F. WHITFIELD."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Battle J.\nWe are of opinion that the judgment rendered in the court below upon the case agreed is erroneous and must be reversed. The devise of the land in question to all the testator\u2019s grandchildren is an executory devise alternative to that to the testator\u2019s grandsons, Hazard Whitfield, Cicero Whitfield and Lewis Whitfield, or the survivor of them, both depending at present upon the death of the first devisee, B. Franklin Whitfield, \u201cleaving no heirs of his own body.\u201d Until the defendant B. Franklin Whitfield shall die leaving no children or other descendants, it will necessarily remain uncertain whether the estate in the land will vest in the first or second class of devisees. It follows that the conveyance made by the defendant, though supported by the deeds made to him by Hazard and Cicero Whitfield, the survivors of the first class of executory devisees, cannot transfer a title free from the claim of the testator\u2019s grand children, who compose the alternative class\u2019of executory devisees. See Fearne on Remainders 373; Winder v. Smith, 2 Jones, 327.\nJudgment reversed and judgment for the plaintiff.\nPer Curiam. Judgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Battle J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Nojcounsel for the appellant.",
      "Strong, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JOHN W. ISLER v. B. F. WHITFIELD.\nThe contingency involved in a limitation over upon the death of one \u201cleaving no heirs of his body,\u201d cannot be determined until the death has occurred; therefore,\nWhere one devised land to a grandson, providing that if he died without, an heir of his body, it should go over to certain other grandsons and the survivors of them, and in case the last survivor of these died without heirs of his body, then over; held that the first taker and the grandsons together could not convey an indefeasible title in fee.\n(Winder v. Smith, 2 Jon., 327; cited and approved.)\nCovenant, tried before Warren J., at Fall Term 1867 of the Superior Court of Wayne.\nThe defendant had theretofore conveyed land to the plaintiff in fee, covenanting that he was seized in fee simple,\" and had the right to convey in fee with an indefeasible title. The action was brought for an alleged breach of these covenants.\nThe defendant claimed title under the will of Lewis Whitfield who had died in 1850. In this will the land in question was devised to the defendant with the following limitations: \u201cAnd in the event of the death of the said Franklin Whitfield leaving no heir of his own body, then in that event the above described lands and other property shall descend to the three sons of Lewis Whitfield, - dee\u2019d., Hazard Whitfield, Cicero Whitfield and Lewis Whitfield, or the survivor of them; in case the last survivor of the sons of L. S. Whitfield, dec\u2019d, should die leaving no heir or heirs of his own body, the said lands or real estate shall be equally divided between all my grandchildren.\u201d After the death of the testator, Lewis Whitfield, named above as a devisee, died without issue, leaving Hazard and Cicero Whitfield his only heirs. Thereupon they, before the conveyance by the defendant to the plaintiff, conveyed in fee to the defendant.\nAt the time of the testator\u2019s death and also at that of the' conveyance there were other grand children than those above named; and of those above named Hazard alone has children.\nUpon the above facts submitted to him as a case agreed, his Honor gave judgment pro forma for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed.\nNojcounsel for the appellant.\nStrong, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0493-01",
  "first_page_order": 505,
  "last_page_order": 506
}