{
  "id": 11276233,
  "name": "THE STATE v. HENDERSON CAUDLE and others",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Caudle",
  "decision_date": "1868-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "30",
  "last_page": "31",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "63 N.C. 30"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1259,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.449,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.0680394983250555e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5590644473867009
    },
    "sha256": "ec25bc4d8cb8c461b390b3bdfc191f78c4496017132f7f9225cfc1abb536f69f",
    "simhash": "1:073c51e670e850ab",
    "word_count": 218
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:51:48.011339+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "THE STATE v. HENDERSON CAUDLE and others."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Battle, J.\nThe only ground upon which the motion in arrest of the judgment in this case is based, is expressly removed by the Act, Rev. Code, c. 35, s. 20. Among the omissions in an indictment, which by force of that section cannot be made available in arrest of judgment after a verdict, is that of not stating \u201c the time at which - the offense was committed, in any case where time is not of the essence of tbe offense.\u201d It cannot be insisted that time is of the essence of the offense of Forcible Trespass.\nThere is no error, and it must be certified as the law directs.\nPeb CuRiAM. No error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Battle, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General, for the State.",
      "No counsel for the prisoner."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "THE STATE v. HENDERSON CAUDLE and others.\nAfter conviction of a Forcible Trespass, judgment will not be arrested -because the indictment contains no allegation as to the time when the offence was committed.\nForcible Trespass, tried before Mitchell, J., at Spring Term 1868 of the Superior Court of Yadein.\nOn the trial below, after a Yerdict for the State, the defendant moved in arrest of judgment because the indictment contained no specification of time in connection with the commission of the offence charged. This motion was refused, and judgment having been pronounced, the defendant appealed.\nAttorney General, for the State.\nNo counsel for the prisoner."
  },
  "file_name": "0030-01",
  "first_page_order": 46,
  "last_page_order": 47
}