{
  "id": 11276601,
  "name": "MARY A. RIVES and others v. G. J. WILLIAMS and others",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rives v. Williams",
  "decision_date": "1869-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "128",
  "last_page": "129",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "63 N.C. 128"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 1015,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.464,
    "sha256": "d36e4107684fe9baaf7907c2efbf73e1c12f937669be5b33a8ba6bb2e5febea3",
    "simhash": "1:defe7df02e5c346c",
    "word_count": 173
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:51:48.011339+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MARY A. RIVES and others v. G. J. WILLIAMS and others."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Reade, J.\nSee Opinion in Jacobs v. Smallwood. There is error. Let this be certified.\nPer Curiam. Judgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Reade, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Manning, for the appellants.",
      "York, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MARY A. RIVES and others v. G. J. WILLIAMS and others.\nComplaiNT, heard before Tourgee, J., at Chambers, in December 1868, and brought before this Court by an appeal on the part of the plaintiff's.\nThe case showed that the defendant as sheriff had levied an execution, returnable to Spring Term 1868 of the Superiqr Court of Chatham, upon certain lands; that a ven. ex. had issued thereupon returnable to Fall Term of the same Court,, and that the sheriff had made no return upon this last process.\nThe complaint was filed upon the 18th day of December 1868; upon the 28th the defendant filed a demurrer, on the-ground that the debt upon which the execution was issued, was. within the operation of the ordinances staying the collection of debts.\nThe clerk having sustained the demurrer, the plaintiffs appealed to the Judge, and then again to this Court.\nManning, for the appellants.\nYork, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0128-01",
  "first_page_order": 144,
  "last_page_order": 145
}