{
  "id": 8683312,
  "name": "THE STATE v. DANIEL R. McINTOSH",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. McIntosh",
  "decision_date": "1870-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "607",
  "last_page": "607",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "64 N.C. 607"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "63 N. C. 507",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11277971
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/63/0507-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "63 N. C. 507",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11277971
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/63/0507-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 107,
    "char_count": 1116,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.413,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.343526598247368e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7924294041853406
    },
    "sha256": "c1250f4011f4b4edff09696e3c9fa8d37dc9a0cdbdb7df9010f6012fe3de1ebb",
    "simhash": "1:ea24db9caf62f5ab",
    "word_count": 194
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:28:35.890237+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "THE STATE v. DANIEL R. McINTOSH."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Dick, J.\nA proceeding in bastardy, is a civil action, as distinguished from a criminal action: Const. Art. IY, s. 1.\nUnder the Code of Civil Procedure, it is a special proceeding, as distinguished from a civil action proper. In such special proceeding a party may be examined as a witness in his own behalf: O. O. P. \u00a7\u00a7 342-3; State v. Waldrop, 63 N. C. 507; State v. Pate, Bus. 244.\nThere was error in the ruling of his Honor, and there must be a venire de novo upon the issues submitted.\nLet this be certified.\nPer Curiam. Venire de novo..",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Dick, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Phillips & Merrimon, for the appellant.",
      "F. S. Busbee, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "THE STATE v. DANIEL R. McINTOSH.\nUpon the trial of issues in proceedings for bastardy the defendant is a competent witness.\n(State v. Waldrop, 63 N. C. 507; State v. Pate, Bus. 244, cited and approved.)\nSpecial proceedings for basta/rcly, tried before Gan-non, J., at Fall Term 1869 of Yancey Court.\nUpon the trial of the issues, the defendant tendered himself as a witness, hut his Honor excluded him, as incompetent. The defendant excepted.\nYerdict, G-uilty; Judgment accordingly, and Appeal by the defendant.\nPhillips & Merrimon, for the appellant.\nF. S. Busbee, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0607-01",
  "first_page_order": 631,
  "last_page_order": 631
}