{
  "id": 8697530,
  "name": "S. E. BRATTON v. JOHN ALLISON",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bratton v. Allison",
  "decision_date": "1874-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "498",
  "last_page": "499",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "70 N.C. 498"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 184,
    "char_count": 3469,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.41,
    "sha256": "8112d5b33a4363df9b02ae9ecaaa10f3bc0529a3f881b2636d39ae250f60aea2",
    "simhash": "1:e2218d931b352e55",
    "word_count": 616
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:53:06.826178+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "S. E. BRATTON v. JOHN ALLISON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "\u25a0Eeade, J.\nThe rule for the calculation of the interest is to calculate the interest upon the principal for the first year, and set the interest aside. Then calculate the interest upon the principal for the second year just as for the first year, and set that amount aside also. And so on up to the time of the first payment. Then calculate the interest upon each year\u2019s interest separately, up to the time of the payment, just as if a bond had been given each year for each year\u2019s interest, and the interest calculated upon each of these bonds from its date up to the time of the payment. Then apply the payment to the extinguishment of these interest bonds, and the surplus of the payment apply in part satisfaction of the principal of the original bond. And then pursue the same course from the time of the first to the time of the second payment, and so on.\nThat is the rule when the payment is sufficient to satisfy all the interest bonds. If the payment is not enough to satisfy all the-interest bonds, then the payment is to be applied to the interest on the interest bonds, and the surplus to the principal of the interest bonds as far as it will go.\nIf the payment is not enough to satisfy the interest on the interest bonds, then the payment is set aside, and neither stops interest nor bears interest. And this is fair, because as the interest updn interest does'not bear interest, so the payment which is less than that does not bear interest.\nThere is error in the mode of calculating the interest by the Court below. This will be certified to the end that the interest may be calculated and the payments applied according to this opinion.\nPee CuexaM. Judgment accordingly.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "\u25a0Eeade, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Wilson d\u00e9 Son, Jones d\u00e9 Johnson and Me C\u00f3rlele d\u00e9 Bailey, .for appellant.",
      "Va/nee d\u00e9 Dowd, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "S. E. BRATTON v. JOHN ALLISON.\nTlio rule for computing interest on a bond given in South Carolina, is ' to calculate the interest upon the principal for the first year, setting the interest aside, and then for the second, third and so on until the time for the first payment. Then calculate the interest on each year\u2019s interest to the same time, and apply the payment first to the extin-guishment of this interest, and the surplus, if any, to a reduction of the principal. If the payment is not sufficient to pay this interest, first extinguish the interest calculated on each year\u2019s interest, and apply the surplus to the principal interest as far as it will go. If the payment is not enough to satisfy the interest on the interest, it is set aside, and neither stops nor bears interest.\nMotioN to suspend an execution, and correct a judgment as to the calculation of interest, obtained at the preceding Term, heard by Logan, J., at the Fall Term, 1873, of MecklenbuRG -Superior Court.\nAt the Special (July) Term, 1873, the plaintiff obtained a judgment against the defendant upon two notes made in South Carolina, when if was referred to the Olterk to calculate tbe interest and enter up the judgment. This the Clerk proceeded to-do-after the adjournment of the Court, and issued execution for the amount.\nAfter notice, the defendant applies to the Judge of the 9th District to set the execution aside aDd correct the error. His Honor orders, upon hearing the affidavits filed, that the defendant pay the amount admitted by him to be due to the plaintiff, and that as to the balance it be referred to overhaul the calculation of interest, &c. From this order the defendant appeals.\nWilson d\u00e9 Son, Jones d\u00e9 Johnson and Me C\u00f3rlele d\u00e9 Bailey, .for appellant.\nVa/nee d\u00e9 Dowd, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0498-01",
  "first_page_order": 514,
  "last_page_order": 515
}