{
  "id": 8698084,
  "name": "H. C. WALL and others v. HENRY FAIRLEY and others",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wall v. Fairley",
  "decision_date": "1874-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "537",
  "last_page": "537",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "70 N.C. 537"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 115,
    "char_count": 1101,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.401,
    "sha256": "ad66be4e5049a91e00ce9dcf57199a2d8dc16983cb1be2722ac19387cc4b2a4e",
    "simhash": "1:980b4c7046b7542c",
    "word_count": 191
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:53:06.826178+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "H. C. WALL and others v. HENRY FAIRLEY and others."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Reade, J.\nThe power of the Court below to allow the amendment, is the only question. And about that there is no doubt. The case of Robinson v. Willoughby, 67 N. C. Rep. 84, is decidedly in point in favor, of the power.\nThere is no error. This will be certified.\nPek Cubiam. Order affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Reade, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "WMcL. McKay and MoJYeill, for appellant.",
      "Battle c& Soy,, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "H. C. WALL and others v. HENRY FAIRLEY and others.\nThe presiding Judge, on a trial in the Court below, has the power in his discretion to allow or refuse amendments to the pleadings.\n(Bobmson v. WiTloucfliby, 67, N, C. Rep. 84, cited and approved.)\nMotioN, by plaintiff's, to amend the- pleadings, heard at Spring Term, 1873, before his Honor, Buxton, J-, of the Supe-perior Court of RichmoND county.\nThe amendment asked, consisted in substituting an amended complaint in lieu of the original, which the counsel represented to his Honor had been filed under a misapprehension of the facts of the ease; the true state of which had come to light since the original was filed.\nThe Court allowed the amendment, from which order, defendants appealed.\nWMcL. McKay and MoJYeill, for appellant.\nBattle c& Soy,, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0537-01",
  "first_page_order": 553,
  "last_page_order": 553
}