{
  "id": 11278393,
  "name": "ALEXANDER MITCHELL and others, Tax payers, v. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TOWNSHIP No. 8",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mitchell v. Board of Trustees of Township No. 8",
  "decision_date": "1874-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "400",
  "last_page": "401",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "71 N.C. 400"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 242,
    "char_count": 3189,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.457,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.504425350900513e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8098684517900464
    },
    "sha256": "1fb0ae067f7a5bd56a9cb52aff5e4f394a7d4a00695280c62a81b3cbe4509a3e",
    "simhash": "1:2faf7f9c1e405e44",
    "word_count": 522
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:06:20.176490+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ALEXANDER MITCHELL and others, Tax payers, v. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TOWNSHIP No. 8."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Reads, J.\nAt the time when the taxes complained of were-levied, the \u201cBoard of Trustees had power to lay and collect all' taxes which were required to defray the necessary expenses of the Township.\u201d Acts 1868-\u201969, chap. 185, sec. 19 ; Bat. Rev-chap. 112, sec. 19. And having tho power, very much \u2014 almost, everything \u2014 must be left to the discretion of the Board to determine what were necessaries. It borders on the ridiculous-to ask the Courts to say whether $34 for office rent, $20 for a. book, $25 for a table, &c., &c., are necessary expenses. Such; things must usually be left to the Board. If they are extravagant, the ballot-box is the appropriate remedy.\nBut the counsel on both sides had overlooked the fact that-the statute, supra, authorizing the Board to levy and collect taxes for necessary expenses has been repealed, and the Board is forbidden to levy and collect taxes for necessary expenses.. Acts L873-\u201964, chap. 106, secs, one and two.\nIt is true that the taxes complained of were ordered before-the passage of the last named act; but that act forbids them, to be collected. So that the order to collect what the Legislature has forbidden to be collected, must go for nothing. The-same act, sec. 3, provides another way for paying the necessary expenses of the. Township, which frees the repealing act from\u00bb, the objection of violating contracts.\nThe injunction prayed for ought to have been granted.\nThere is error.\nPee Cueiait. \u2022 Judgment reversed..",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Reads, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Haughton and Smith de Strong, for appellants.",
      "JPou and Seymour, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ALEXANDER MITCHELL and others, Tax payers, v. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TOWNSHIP No. 8.\nTownship Boards of Trustees are forbidden by the Act of 1873-\u201974, chap. 106, sections 1 and 3, to levy and collect taxes for necessary expenses \u2014 and although such taxes were ordered before the passage of that Act, they cannot be collected since its passage.\nThis was an APPLICATION for an injunction to restrain the defendants from collecting certain taxes, heard before Clarice, j., at Spring Term, 1874, of CraveN Superior Court.\nThe plaintiffs, citizens and tax-payers of Township No. 8, of the county of Craven, applied to Judge Watts on the 24th January, 1874, for a restraining order to be directed to the defendants who were the Board of Trustees of said Township, enjoining the collection of certain taxes, which the plaintiffs alleged had been levied by the defenda\u2019nts to pay certain extravagant bills, &c., under the pretence that such bills and accounts were necessary expenses. The complaint of the plaintiffs contain many other allegations, irrelevant to the point decided in this Court, and therefore omitted in this statement.\nHis Honor granted the order, as prayed, restraining the defendants from collecting the tax until the matter could be heard.\nAt Spring Term, 1874, the defendants answered, admitting the levy of the tax, bnt averring it was for the necessary expenses of the township, heretofore incurred, and likewise current which were not unjust or extravagant, but reasonable, &c. Upon coming in of defendants\u2019 answer his Honor vacated the restraining order theretofore issued, from which vacating order the plaintiffs appealed.\nHaughton and Smith de Strong, for appellants.\nJPou and Seymour, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0400-01",
  "first_page_order": 408,
  "last_page_order": 409
}