{
  "id": 8687931,
  "name": "JOSIAH TURNER, Jr., v. W. W. HOLDEN",
  "name_abbreviation": "Turner v. Holden",
  "decision_date": "1875-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "134",
  "last_page": "135",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "72 N.C. 134"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 84,
    "char_count": 927,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.473,
    "sha256": "c653b2b6f3dd85fdb6d56248c4e3a64dfd5d8adea415ade2eb1f36a18f2390e8",
    "simhash": "1:140fb0f04a8a87d8",
    "word_count": 160
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:28:46.712943+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JOSIAH TURNER, Jr., v. W. W. HOLDEN."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Rodman, J.\nThis appeal was taken from the ruling of his Honor, that the action was not discontinued as to the defendant Holden. As we have decided in the case of the present plaintiff against Douglass, that the action was not discontinued as to him, the ground on which the present appeal was taken, fails. There is no error in the judgment appealed from, which is affirmed, and the ease is remanded to be proceeded in, cfee. Let this opinion be-certified.\nPee Ctteiam. Judgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Rodman, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Moore <& Gatling, for appellant.",
      "Devereux and Jones & Jones, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JOSIAH TURNER, Jr., v. W. W. HOLDEN.\n(Eor Syllabus, see the preceeding case of Turner v. Douglass.)\nThis is a part of the preceding case of Turner v. Douglass, ante, and the motion to discontinue was decided at the same term.\nThe facts are fully stated in the preceding ease. From the refusal of his Honor, to discontinue the case as to defendant, Holden, he appealed.\nMoore <& Gatling, for appellant.\nDevereux and Jones & Jones, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0134-01",
  "first_page_order": 144,
  "last_page_order": 145
}