{
  "id": 8691675,
  "name": "HENRY VON GLAHN v. JOHN DAWSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "Von Glahn v. Dawson",
  "decision_date": "1875-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "338",
  "last_page": "338",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "73 N.C. 338"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 59,
    "char_count": 478,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.433,
    "sha256": "ab09070d878371116993bbbc4614601f9148d937ba8f0373fdfb6d1782ad8d0d",
    "simhash": "1:4c7fe05253463033",
    "word_count": 85
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:55:27.517682+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "HENRY VON GLAHN v. JOHN DAWSON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pearson, C. J.\nSame opinion as in Yon Glahn v. Latimer.\nPer Curiam.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pearson, C. J. Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "French and W. S. <& D. J. Devane, for appellant.",
      "Strange and Battle dk Son, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "HENRY VON GLAHN v. JOHN DAWSON.\n(For the Syllabus, see the case of Von Glahn v. Harris, ante page 330.)\nThe points raised in this, and the facts relating thereto, are similar to those in the preceding case of Von Glahn v. Latimer.\nIn the Court below, the defendant had judgment, and the plaintiff appealed.\nFrench and W. S. <& D. J. Devane, for appellant.\nStrange and Battle dk Son, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0338-01",
  "first_page_order": 346,
  "last_page_order": 346
}