{
  "id": 8692691,
  "name": "C. W. OLDHAM and wife v. THE MECHANICS' BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION",
  "name_abbreviation": "Oldham v. Mechanics' Building & Loan Ass'n",
  "decision_date": "1875-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "378",
  "last_page": "379",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "73 N.C. 378"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 93,
    "char_count": 930,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.429,
    "sha256": "3f6108e14fb18f58dd79b37247d98b9a9968b251cc1dd3a53eb8e1a1d168c0dc",
    "simhash": "1:091cf012024e3cbe",
    "word_count": 154
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:55:27.517682+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "C. W. OLDHAM and wife v. THE MECHANICS' BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PeaesoN, O. J.\nSame opinion as in Smith v. Mechanics\u2019 Building & Loan Association.\nError, and judgment according to that opinion, which will be certified.\nPer Curiam.\nOrder reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PeaesoN, O. J. Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Strange, London and French, for appellant.",
      "Smith di Strong, Fowle and Batchelor, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "C. W. OLDHAM and wife v. THE MECHANICS' BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION.\n(See the Syllabus in the preceding case.)\nCivil actioN, for the cancellation of a mortgage and for an account, and also praying for an injunction, heard before Kerr, </., at Chambers in the county of New' HaNoveb, on the 6th day of March, 1875.\nThe facts in this case are substantially the same as in the ease of Smith and wife v. The Mechanics' Building da Loan Association, (the same defendant,) and the same orders were made by bis Honor, the presiding Judge.\nFrom the order, vacating the restraining the order and refusing to grant the injunction prayed for, the plaintiff appealed.\nStrange, London and French, for appellant.\nSmith di Strong, Fowle and Batchelor, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0378-01",
  "first_page_order": 386,
  "last_page_order": 387
}