{
  "id": 8694414,
  "name": "R. D. WHITLEY, Guardian, and others v. A. A. ALEXANDER, Administrator, and others",
  "name_abbreviation": "Whitley v. Alexander",
  "decision_date": "1875-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "463",
  "last_page": "463",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "73 N.C. 463"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 94,
    "char_count": 849,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.407,
    "sha256": "75c9f8a15adc348aafdf62282ea0a6f03c164cf81a70e2b2290980aee1ff7af9",
    "simhash": "1:2fdf50681a66637f",
    "word_count": 141
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:55:27.517682+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "R. D. WHITLEY, Guardian, and others v. A. A. ALEXANDER, Administrator, and others."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Hodman, J.\nThe questions presented in both of these appeals are the same, and the decision on the other appeal will apply to the present. A judgment may be drawn in conformity with the opinion in that appeal.\nPer Curiam.\nJudgment accordingly.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Hodman, J. Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Wilson (& Son and Jones <& Johnston, for appellants.",
      "Barringer, Vanee <& Dowd and Shipp (& Bailey, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "R. D. WHITLEY, Guardian, and others v. A. A. ALEXANDER, Administrator, and others.\n(For the Syllabus, see the preceding case.)\nCivil action against the administrator of a surety on a guardian bond, tried on exceptions to the report of the Clerk, to whom it had been referred, by his Honor, Judge Sehenek, at Spring Term, 1875, of Mecklenburg Superior Court.\nThe facts in this case are like those in the preceding case between the same parlies. From the ruling of his Honor, the defendants appealed.\nWilson (& Son and Jones <& Johnston, for appellants.\nBarringer, Vanee <& Dowd and Shipp (& Bailey, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0463-01",
  "first_page_order": 471,
  "last_page_order": 471
}