{
  "id": 8695251,
  "name": "WM. A. ROGERS, Ex'r of JOHN DRAKE, Deceased, v. ROBERT McKENZIE and JOHN McNAIR",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rogers v. McKenzie",
  "decision_date": "1875-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "487",
  "last_page": "491",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "73 N.C. 487"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 430,
    "char_count": 8757,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.437,
    "sha256": "f095bc71fd6f783184fabaadd820bddbb7a0140344ccbb3a133727a8e3295c33",
    "simhash": "1:39e31f812f1eab73",
    "word_count": 1605
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:55:27.517682+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WM. A. ROGERS, Ex\u2019r of JOHN DRAKE, Deceased, v. ROBERT McKENZIE and JOHN McNAIR."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Bynum, J.\nAs the plaintiff filed no exceptions to the report of the referee, and did not appeal from the judgment of his Honor, allowing the second exception of the defendant, we are to consider the other exceptions of the defendant which were overruled in the Court below, and which are brought to this Court for review, by his appeal.\nWe are of opinion that his Honor erred in not allowing the fifth exception, to-wit, a credit upon the rent for the $140.00 paid on the 18th November, 1861, and the sum of $156.44 for taxes .on the land, paid for the years 1860-61. He is entitled to credit for tire $140, becanse at the time of that payment the first year\u2019s rent was due, and it does not appear that any other debt was due from the defendant to the plaintiff at that time. For, although the referee finds that in 1861, the defendant hired several negro men from the plaintiff at the price of $200 each, it does not appear that any part of the hire was due at the date of this pay men 6, or that it was not paid when it fell duo. The law will therefore apply this payment to the debt which was certainly due, and not to a claim which does not appear to have been due, or to have been unsettled.\nThe defendant is also entitled to credit on the rent for the 6nm of $156.44 taxes on the land, paid by him, because it may fairly be presumed that the tax was paid to prevent the sale of the land for the tax and to secure the benefit of his lease. 4s the taxes were paid for the ease and benefit of the plaintiff\u2019s testator, his assent thereto will be presumed. The date of this payment is not found, but as the defendant did not. lease until 1861, the date of this credit will be fixed at the time, the taxes for 1861 were due apd ereditable, to be ascertained by the Clerk.\nThe Clerk of this Court will reform the report in accordance with this opinion, and judgment will be rendered for the sum due after reforming the report.\nThe plaintiff will pay the cost of this Court.\nPeb Cubiah.\nJudgment accordingly.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Bynum, J. Peb Cubiah."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Leiich, for appellant.",
      "N. A. McLean and WMoL, McKay, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WM. A. ROGERS, Ex\u2019r of JOHN DRAKE, Deceased, v. ROBERT McKENZIE and JOHN McNAIR.\nA and B rent from 0 all the turpentine boxes on a certain piece of land from the 1st January, 1861, to the 1st January, 1865, the rent to be paid on the 1st June in each year. 0 died in March, 1868; in November, 1881, A paid 0 $140, and in the same year paid taxes on the land for 0, to the amount of $156.44. In an action by D, the executor of 0, against A and B to recover the rent due the testator: It was held, that only one year\u2019s rent was due the estate of C; and that A and B, having paid the $140 and the taxes after such rent was due, were entitled to have the same credited thereon.\nCivil aotioN, commenced in February, 1868, as an action of Covenant, and tried before his Honor Judge Kerr, at Spring Term, 1875, of the Superior Court of Robeson county, upon exceptions to the report of the referee.\nAt Fall Term, 1874, the cause was, by consent, referred to Nat. McLean, who at the ensuing Spring Term, 1875, reported :\nThat the defendant, McKenzie had been dead for more than two terms, and that the suit had abated as to him.\nThe other defendant, McNair, offered evidence tending to prove that he was surety only; such was not proved to the satisfaction of the referee, who declined to report it asan established fact.\nThe plaintiff proved the execution of the following writing, upon which the suit was brought.\n\u201cWe, or either of us, promise to pay to John Drake, or order, for all the boxes that will be on the land known as the \u201cDrake land,\u201d betwixt the creek and Back Swamp, six dollars and fifty cents a thousand per year; all on the other side of the said Back Swamp, five dollars a thousand per year. It is understood that the above lands are rented for four years, for turpentine purposes only; further understood, the rent is to be paid on the 1st day of June of each year, beginning on the 1st day of January, 1861, ending January 1st, 1865.\nROBERT MoKENZIE, [seal.]\nMarch 19th, 1861. JOHN MoNAIR, [seal.]\u201d\nThe defendant\u2019s counsel moved to non-suit the plaintiff, cn the ground that the action should have been debt and not covenant. Motion overruled.\nThe testator of the plaintiff, John Drake, died 23d March, 1863. There was due the executor on the 22d March, 1875, \u00a71,597.53, of which sum $892.70 principal money, being the rent for the years 1861 and 1862, and until 23d March, 1863. The defendant, McKenzie, -paid to the testator, Drake, $140 on the 18th November, 1861, and he paid Drake\u2019s taxes for the years 1861 and 1862, amounting to $156.46, but when, it did not appear. McKenzie also paid to the heirs of Amanda Nash and Mrs. McCormick, on the 10th November, 1864, $900, the rent for the years 1862-\u201963 and \u201964, in Confederate money.\nIt appeared in evidence, without objection, that McKenzie .fired from the testator, the said Drake, five negro men during the year 1861, at the price of $200 each. It also appeared that McKenzie operated the boxes only one year, to wit, 1861.\nThere were 37,000 boxes between the Creek and Buck Swamp at $6.50 a thousand, amounting to $240.50; and 32,000 boxes on the other side of said swamp, at $5 per thousand, amounting to $160 per year.\nIt is therefore adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $1,597.53 and costs.\nTo the foregoing report, at the same term, the defendant, McNair, excepted in this :\n(1.) In ruling that covenant and riot debt was the proper remedy tor an executor to collect, arrears of rent due his testator in his lifetime.\n(2.) In charging the defendant any rents after the first day of June, 1862; for that no rent fell due after that time, and before the death of the testator.\n(3.) Eor charging the defendant with the rent for more than one year, inasmuch as the facts reported show that the turpentine trees were only used one year.\n(4) In finding $892.70, principal money, was due from the defendant, without reporting any facts from which the Court can see that, that or any other amount, or what amount, according to the contract reported, was due or owing.\n(5.) In failing to credit the defendant with the sum of $140, paid on the 18th November, 1861; and the further sum of $156.46, paid by the defendant in liquidation of the taxes of the plaintiff\u2019s testator, for the years 1860 and 1861\n(6.) Assuming that covenant was the proper action, in reporting the plaintiff\u2019s measure of damages to be the rent contracted to be paid for the use of the turpentine trees during the time they worked, inasmuch as they had not deteriorated in value, as they would have done if tney had been worked, and the measure of damages would be less by the amount of the deterioration in value, that the amount contracted to be paid annually as rent.\n(7.) In reporting facts about matters immaterial to the question at issue, to wit; that the defendant, McKenzie, paid t.o the heirs of John Drake, on the 10th November, 1864, $900, the rent for the years 186 \u2014 \u201963\u2014\u201964, in Confederate money ; and that the said McKenzie hired from the said Drake five negro men during the year 1861, at the price of $200 each.\nUpon the hearing of the report and the exceptions filed, his Honor overruled the first exception, and sustained the second, ordering the report to be reformed, so as to strike out of the account the rent after June 1st, 1872. The referee being in Court, was allowed to amend his report, by stating that he arrived at the amount of rent, by finding that the 37,000 boxes between the creek and Black swamp, at $5.50 per thousand amounting to $240.50 per annum ; and 32,000 boxes on the other side of said swamp, at $5 per thousand, amounting to $160 per annum \u2014 making for all $400.50 p>er annum.\nIt appearing to the Court, by the referee\u2019s finding of facts, that the covenant was entered into January 1st, 1861 ; that the testator died March 23d, 187S ; and as the rent was only duo and payable on the 1st day of June in each year, that no rent had accrued to the testator from and after June 1st, 1862, leaving the plaintiff entitled to recovei against the defendant, McNair, (McKenzie having died since the commencement of this action,) as breaches of his covenant during tire life of John Drake, the rent from January 1st, 1861, to June 1st, 1862, \u2014 one year and five months, at $400 per annum.\nIt is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court, that the plaintiff do recover of the defendant, McNair, one thousand and three dollars and eighty cents, ($1,003,80,) with interest on $567.00 from the first day of April, 1875, till paid amd for the costs of this action ; and that the referee, Nat. McLean, be allowed $60, one half to be paid by each of the parties plaintiff and defendant.\nLeiich, for appellant.\nN. A. McLean and WMoL, McKay, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0487-01",
  "first_page_order": 495,
  "last_page_order": 499
}