{
  "id": 8681737,
  "name": "STATE to the use of the BOARD OF EDUCATION v. ALBERT C. MOODY, and others",
  "name_abbreviation": "State ex rel. Board of Education v. Moody",
  "decision_date": "1876-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "77",
  "last_page": "77",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "74 N.C. 77"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 86,
    "char_count": 833,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.385,
    "sha256": "83890dce5d6050b7e9d4f7bef9a2a01e53e98c4c67bed5db96aa0c0a39a20637",
    "simhash": "1:bb645b3c067a64f3",
    "word_count": 148
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:08:39.099656+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE to the use of the BOARD OF EDUCATION v. ALBERT C. MOODY, and others."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Peade, J.\nThere are three cases between the same parties involving the same points. An opinion-has been delivered in one, and the decision in this is the same.\nNote. \u2014 Why was not one case brought up and the others allowed to. -await the decis.on of the Court ?\nPee Cueiam. Judgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Peade, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Hargrove, for the appellant.",
      "W-right <Jh Stead mu-n, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE to the use of the BOARD OF EDUCATION v. ALBERT C. MOODY, and others.\n(Same syl'abus as in State to the use of the Board, of Education v. Moodyy an others,, amia page 73.)\nCeetiokaei upon a judgment rendered at Spring Term,, 1875, PobesoN Superior Court, Kerr, J.. presiding.-\nThe facts in this case arc the' sanie, and the same points are involved, as in the case of State to the une of the hoard of Jidu\u00fautiun vs. Moody and others, reported ante page 73.\nAttorney General Hargrove, for the appellant.\nW-right <Jh Stead mu-n, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0077-01",
  "first_page_order": 87,
  "last_page_order": 87
}