{
  "id": 8681779,
  "name": "CAROLINA CENTRAL RAILWAY CO. v. COMMISSIONERS OF RICHMOND COUNTY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Carolina Central Railway Co. v. Commissioners of Richmond County",
  "decision_date": "1876-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "83",
  "last_page": "84",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "74 N.C. 83"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 110,
    "char_count": 1244,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.404,
    "sha256": "2ab1f9abd209fc50463f73e8a80ce5a5d632e4a044ad83afeb91695934e64ca1",
    "simhash": "1:938671ce962974a0",
    "word_count": 205
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:08:39.099656+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CAROLINA CENTRAL RAILWAY CO. v. COMMISSIONERS OF RICHMOND COUNTY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Ssttle, J.\nThe only points presented by this record are decided- in Wade v. Commissioners of Craven county, at this term.\nWe refer to that decision for the reasons which induce us-to:. declare,,, that the judgment of Iiis Honor in this case is affirmed.\nPer Curiam. Judgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Ssttle, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Steele &\u25a0 Walker, Strange and Busbee c& Busbee, for the .appellant.",
      "Shaw and Hinsdale, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CAROLINA CENTRAL RAILWAY CO. v. COMMISSIONERS OF RICHMOND COUNTY.\n{Same syllabus as in the next preceding case of Wade v. The Commissioners of Craven, which is cited and approved.)\nThis was an appear from the decision of the defendant, the Board of Commissioners of Richmond county, heard before bis Honor, Judge Buxton, at Fall Term, 1875, of the Superior Court of Richmond county.\nAs the case was decided in this court upon a question of law, it is unnecessary to report the facts.\nThe ground upon which the appeal was based was, an excessive valuation of the-property of the plaintiff for taxation. No error in matter of law was alleged as ground for the appeal.\nUpon the hearing, his Honor, upon motion of the defendant\u2019s counsel, dismissed the proceeding on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction thereof. From\u2019this judgment'the plaintiff appealed. \u25a0.\nSteele &\u25a0 Walker, Strange and Busbee c& Busbee, for the .appellant.\nShaw and Hinsdale, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0083-01",
  "first_page_order": 93,
  "last_page_order": 94
}