{
  "id": 8692337,
  "name": "STATE v. GUS. GRAHAM",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Graham",
  "decision_date": "1876-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "256",
  "last_page": "256",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "75 N.C. 256"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 115,
    "char_count": 1338,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.488,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.94940199914826e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5368608362881389
    },
    "sha256": "6dd633ae07e919ce1c39d3a5f7211b18341a0170bd2fa24bc57a43fb6e015f8d",
    "simhash": "1:09db81388af8443c",
    "word_count": 234
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:17:21.962704+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. GUS. GRAHAM."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "\"Bynum, J.\nThe question raised here has been settled at the present term of this Court, in the case of the State v. Watson. It is there held that a partial exchange of circuits between two Judges, with the approval of the Governor, as here, is legal. Judge Sohencic, therefore, had jurisdiction and the right to pronounce sentence upon the defendant.\nThere is no error.\nPer Curiam. Judgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "\"Bynum, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Hargrove and R. H. Rattle, Jr., for the State.",
      "No counsel for the prisoner in this Court."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. GUS. GRAHAM.\nA partial exchange of circuits between two of the Judges of the Superior Court, with the approval of the Governor, is legal.\n{State v. Watson, at this term, cited and approved.)\nIndictment for Larceny, tried before Schenck, J., at Spring Term, 1876, of Anson Superior Court.\nThe case was decided upon appeal in this Court at January Term, 1876, and is reported in 74 N. 0. Rep.\nThe cause coming on to be heard upon the certificate of this Court, at Spring Term, 1876, the prisoner\u2019s counsel moved the Court to arrest the judgment upon the ground that his Honor Judge Schencio had no authority to hold that term of the Court. That the law does not authorize the exchange of two counties of a district unless the two counties constitute the entire district.\nThe motion was overruled and the prisoner appealed.\nAttorney General Hargrove and R. H. Rattle, Jr., for the State.\nNo counsel for the prisoner in this Court."
  },
  "file_name": "0256-01",
  "first_page_order": 264,
  "last_page_order": 264
}