{
  "id": 8698195,
  "name": "JAMES VANN and wife v. THE FAYETTEVILLE BUILDING & LOAN ASSOCIATION",
  "name_abbreviation": "Vann v. Fayetteville Building & Loan Ass'n",
  "decision_date": "1876-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "494",
  "last_page": "494",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "75 N.C. 494"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 104,
    "char_count": 1116,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.466,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.044691340182045e-08,
      "percentile": 0.46594704942257253
    },
    "sha256": "8a2db8a2f8ab311f86378892fdef630faaf222886d4ed9cff4ca0d0bb52684c8",
    "simhash": "1:cc3c345442e47435",
    "word_count": 191
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:17:21.962704+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JAMES VANN and wife v. THE FAYETTEVILLE BUILDING & LOAN ASSOCIATION."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Reade, J.\nThe questions involved in this case are the same as in Mills & Wife v. Salisbury B. & L. Association, at this term, {ante, page 292); and the decision is the same. And the opinion in that case will be certified in this. In this case the amount of interest stated is 8 per cent., which would govern in this case.\nThere is no error.\nPer Curiam. Judgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Reade, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "McRae, Broadfoot and Hinsdale, for appellant.",
      "W. McL. McKay and Guthrie, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JAMES VANN and wife v. THE FAYETTEVILLE BUILDING & LOAN ASSOCIATION.\nFor the Syllabus in this case see that in Mills and wife and others v. The /Salisbury Building & Loan Association, ante, page 292.\nThis was a Motion for an Injunction, heard before his Honor, Judge Buxton, at Chambers, in the County of CUMBERLAND, July 15th, 1875.\nThe leading facts in this case are almost identically the same as those in Mills & Wife and others v. 1 he Salisbury Building & Loan Association, ante, page 292, and therefore need not be stated.\nOn the hearing by his Honor below, he continued the restraining order theretofore granted, from which order, the defendant appealed.\nMcRae, Broadfoot and Hinsdale, for appellant.\nW. McL. McKay and Guthrie, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0494-01",
  "first_page_order": 502,
  "last_page_order": 502
}