{
  "id": 8689489,
  "name": "THORNTON BRADLEY v. JAMES JONES",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bradley v. Jones",
  "decision_date": "1877-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "204",
  "last_page": "205",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "76 N.C. 204"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 145,
    "char_count": 1523,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.441,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.05599100147019e-07,
      "percentile": 0.955015910193992
    },
    "sha256": "0c585af037fe82bc950139bed606e0f40caa2048b4de913713371074d40dc04d",
    "simhash": "1:7ab75c593bd83a7a",
    "word_count": 267
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:21:57.000998+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "THORNTON BRADLEY v. JAMES JONES."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Reade, J,\nThere is no complaint'in the record. There is only an amended answer. There is no statement of the case made out by tbe appellant and none by the appellee ; nor is there any agreement that His Honor should make one. There is however a statement by His Honor that it was an action for two parcels \u2018 of land, that the plaintiff offered in evidence a number of deeds, none of which are set out or appended, some of which were admitted as color of title only, .one rejected because not properly proved and registered, that a number of witnesses were introduced as to possession and boundaries, and that he nonsuited the plaintiff. But why he nonsuited him is not stated.\nThere are no points stated or questions presented for the decision of this Court. It is possible that we might hit upon the matters in dispute, but we cannot jeopardize the rights of the parties upon such records.\nThe case is remanded, each party paying his own costs in this Court.\nPee, Cx/RiAM. Judgment accordingly.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Reade, J,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Smith \u00a3 Strong, for plaintiff.",
      "Messrs. M. JET. 'Justice and W. J. Montgomery, for defendant.."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "THORNTON BRADLEY v. JAMES JONES.\nPractice \u2014 Supreme Court \u2014 Record.\nWhen the record of a case brought up on appeal to this Court is imperfect, the case will bo remanded to the Court below\nCivil ActioN to recover possession of land, tried at Eall Term, 1876, of Polii Superior Court, before Schenck, J.\nIn consequence of an imperfect record there was no decision upon the merits and the case was rema..ded to the Court below.\nMessrs. Smith \u00a3 Strong, for plaintiff.\nMessrs. M. JET. 'Justice and W. J. Montgomery, for defendant.."
  },
  "file_name": "0204-01",
  "first_page_order": 216,
  "last_page_order": 217
}