{
  "id": 8683012,
  "name": "L. D. BYRD and others, Executors, v. W. B. SURLES and wife and others",
  "name_abbreviation": "Byrd v. Surles",
  "decision_date": "1877-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "435",
  "last_page": "436",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "77 N.C. 435"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 113,
    "char_count": 1088,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.456,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.55666366498979e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4881452548005695
    },
    "sha256": "9e3b7fbbb6df0e57d321a48e790c2d6d150b84ce8c58edcdcac2f49f2c36e4c3",
    "simhash": "1:cb332cf6ce4e3618",
    "word_count": 192
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:46:21.915598+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "L. D. BYRD and others, Executors, v. W. B. SURLES and wife and others."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Faircloth, J.\nRichard Byrd.made Ms will, February the \u25a026th, 18.76 ; was married, May the 4th, 1876, and died, December the 26th, 1876, and the jury said by their verdict that the said paper writing propounded was not the will of \u25a0said Richard.\nThere is no judgment, order, or exceptions in the case, and we have nothing to decide, except that the marriage revoked the will, and to render judgment against the appellants for the costs in this Court.\nPer C\u00fcRIAm. Judgment accordingly.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Faircloth, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Neill McKay, W. E. Murchison, J. W. Hinsdale, T. ET. Sutton and J. A. Spears, for plaintiffs.",
      "Messrs. John Manning, D. H. McLean and N. W. Lay, for \u25a0defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "L. D. BYRD and others, Executors, v. W. B. SURLES and wife and others.\nWill \u2014 Marriage of Testator.\nThe marriage of a testator subsequent to the making of a will is a revocation of the will.\nCivil Actior tried at Spring Term, 1877, of Harnett1 Superior Court, before MoKoy, J.\nThis was an issue of Devisavit Vel Non and the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the caveators. The case was brought to this Court on appeal by plaintiffs.\nMessrs. Neill McKay, W. E. Murchison, J. W. Hinsdale, T. ET. Sutton and J. A. Spears, for plaintiffs.\nMessrs. John Manning, D. H. McLean and N. W. Lay, for \u25a0defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0435-01",
  "first_page_order": 449,
  "last_page_order": 450
}