{
  "id": 8682071,
  "name": "MIZELL & WALKER v. DENNIS SIMMONS and W. J. HARDISON",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mizell v. Simmons",
  "decision_date": "1880-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "1",
  "last_page": "2",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "82 N.C. 1"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "72 N. C., 240",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8691986
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/72/0240-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "79 N. C., 182",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8687354
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/79/0182-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "81 N. C., 8",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8683701
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/81/0008-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "72 N. C., 240",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8691986
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/72/0240-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "79 N. C., 182",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8687354
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/79/0182-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 155,
    "char_count": 1911,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.539,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.770845263994211e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4140660324211952
    },
    "sha256": "4e5cbb7ef51303cd4c0205abb5b568c7891f8d93ee2991a07468d1db01cd8097",
    "simhash": "1:c94d4ea20fc581f9",
    "word_count": 337
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:32:09.383104+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MIZELL & WALKER v. DENNIS SIMMONS and W. J. HARDISON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Ashe, J.\nThis is a petition to rehear and reverse the judgment rendered in this court in the case of Mizell v. Simmons, at its June term, 1878, and reported in 79 N. C., 182.\nIn the case of Watson v. Dodd, 72 N. C., 240, which, like this, was a petition to rehear, Chief Justice PeaesoN in delivering the opinion of the court said : \u201c The weightiest considerations make it the duty of the court to adhere to their decisions. No case ought to be reversed upon petition to rehear unless it was decided hastily and some material point ivas overlooked, or some direct authority was not called to the attention of the court.\u201d And to the same effect are the cases of Haywood v. Daves, 81 N. C., 8; Devereux v. Devereux, Ibid., 12.\nThis case seems to have been considered in 1878, when -before this court, with very great care, deliberation and labor, from the numerous authorities cited and the able and well considered opinions delivered. But i.t does not appear that any material point was then overlooked or that any important authority was then omitted which is now brought to the attention .of .the court. So far from that being the case, the same authorities then cited are now relied upon, and we are unable to discover any error in the decision then made. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the decision made in this case at the June term, 1878, shall stand as the judgment of this court.\nNo .error. \u2018 Affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Ashe, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. P. B. Winston, Sr., and Mullen & Moore for plaintiffs-;",
      "Messrs. Gilliam & Gatling and Reade, Bushee & Bushee for. defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MIZELL & WALKER v. DENNIS SIMMONS and W. J. HARDISON.\nPetition to Rehear \u2014 Affirmance of Judgment.\nThe decision in Mizellv. Simmons, as reported in 79 N. C., 182, is affirmed, and must stand as the judgment of this court.\n(Watson v. Dodd, 72 N. C., 240, cited and approved.)\nPetition by defendants to Rehear heard at January Term, 1880, of The Supreme Court.\nMessrs. P. B. Winston, Sr., and Mullen & Moore for plaintiffs-;\nMessrs. Gilliam & Gatling and Reade, Bushee & Bushee for. defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0001-01",
  "first_page_order": 25,
  "last_page_order": 26
}