{
  "id": 8683320,
  "name": "STATE v. PETER LEITCH",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Leitch",
  "decision_date": "1880-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "539",
  "last_page": "540",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "82 N.C. 539"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "10 Ired., 29",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ired.",
      "case_ids": [
        1972655
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/32/0029-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "80 N. C., 364",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8694052
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/80/0364-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "10 Ired., 29",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ired.",
      "case_ids": [
        1972655
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/32/0029-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 135,
    "char_count": 1613,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.499,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.3608438240779086e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6359320562704621
    },
    "sha256": "eee0f5526fc277327011fadec0966fffc0f83deacd9db65bbb4a760c1bea4d71",
    "simhash": "1:1523c55bb9cecd3a",
    "word_count": 298
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:32:09.383104+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. PETER LEITCH."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Dillard, J.\nThis was an indictment for murder, and\u00f3n the appeal of the prisoner to this court, there being no statement of the case, it is our duty to look through the record to see if there be any error therein.\nWe have carefully examined the whole record and are unable to detect any error entitling the prisoner to a new trial or arrest of judgment, and in such case we can only have certified our opinion to the court below that the court may proceed to judgment. State v. Ray, 10 Ired., 29; State v. Langford, Busb., 436; State v. Murray, 80 N. C., 364.\nThere is no error and this will be certified to the court below that the sentence of the law may be pronounced and executed.\nPer Curiam. No error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Dillard, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General, for the State.",
      "No counsel for prisoner."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. PETER LEITCH.\nAppeal \u2014 Practice.\nWhere, on an appeal in a capital case, there is no statement of the ease, and no error appears on the record, it will he certified to the court below that there is no error, so that it may proceed to judgment.\n(State y. Bay, 10 Ired., 29; State y. Langford, Bush., 436; State v. Murray, 80 H. C., 364, cited and approYed.)\nINDICTMENT for Murder tried at Fall Term, 1879, of Robeson Superior Court, before Seymour, J.\nJudgment was pronounced upon conviction of the prisoner, and he appealed to this court.\nAttorney General, for the State.\nNo counsel for prisoner.\nThe judge who presided on the trial of this case (after hearing an appeal was taken) informs the Reporter, by letter, that no bond or affidavit, &c., was filed during the term, and no appeal then perfected; and no exception was made to the ruling of the court on evidence or to its charge to the jury."
  },
  "file_name": "0539-01",
  "first_page_order": 563,
  "last_page_order": 564
}