{
  "id": 11275942,
  "name": "In Stradley v. King",
  "name_abbreviation": "Stradley v. King",
  "decision_date": "1882-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "732",
  "last_page": "732",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "86 N.C. 732"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "84 N.C. 637"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 52,
    "char_count": 403,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.439,
    "sha256": "8a3a8a0f41656b8976859f905204ee04afbf3fee1de99e62abaafc997b9a35e5",
    "simhash": "1:6be04e35af7b3018",
    "word_count": 71
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:46:32.041451+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In Stradley v. King,"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "The transcript upon which the court acted shows \u201cthat there was agreement\u201d between purchaser and plaintiff, &o. After the publication of the reports the counsel interested caused a certified copy of the record to be sent up, and called attention to the omission of the word \u201cno\u201d in the said transcript \u00ab \u2014 which should read \u201cthere was no agreement,\u201d &c.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In Stradley v. King,\n84 N. C., page 637, line 3:"
  },
  "file_name": "0732-02",
  "first_page_order": 748,
  "last_page_order": 748
}