{
  "id": 12117569,
  "name": "State v. Bailey",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Bailey",
  "decision_date": "1883-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "701",
  "last_page": "701",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "88 N.C. 701"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "86 N. C., 617",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11275047
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/86/0617-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "79 N. C., 609",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8697767
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/79/0609-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 31,
    "char_count": 228,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.477,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.24549577986979162
    },
    "sha256": "c9197e3ef72c22941933df4e478856bddc2d3ddcd0a6bc2d8e7fca43dfa07331",
    "simhash": "1:69cfdfc654839bf2",
    "word_count": 41
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:18:01.131102+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Bailey,"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Proceeding in bastardy. The questions raised on the trial are governed by the decision in State v. Rogers, 79 N. C., 609, and State v. Crouse, 86 N. C., 617. Judgment of the court below affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "State v. Bailey,\nfrom Mitchell:"
  },
  "file_name": "0701-03",
  "first_page_order": 717,
  "last_page_order": 717
}