{
  "id": 8682998,
  "name": "CATHARINE G. SHELTON v. SARAH L. SHELTON",
  "name_abbreviation": "Shelton v. Shelton",
  "decision_date": "1883-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "185",
  "last_page": "186",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "89 N.C. 185"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 167,
    "char_count": 1927,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.417,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.138363859351185e-08,
      "percentile": 0.47326234077739665
    },
    "sha256": "1e68405fa7b30697a251992eb4221d6f1fcf946346b578d413c4d7065c2cf225",
    "simhash": "1:659ff214ff468bc9",
    "word_count": 332
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:35:46.148190+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CATHARINE G. SHELTON v. SARAH L. SHELTON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "SMITH, C. J.\nThe facts disclosed in the affidavit of the plaintiff\u2019s counsel, to which no opposing evidence is offered, are, that 'separate statements of the case on appeal, prepared for the respective parties, were delivered to the judge who tried the cause, for his adjustment of the differences between them. He transmitted to the clerk a statement of his own, omitting one or more of appellant\u2019s exceptions to the rulings which were intended to be brought up for review, without giving notice to the parties or affording them an opportunity of being heard before his final action. The retirement of the judge from office prevents the perfecting the appeal in the mode prescribed by the statute, and would, in the absence of any case, render unavoidable the award of a new trial. This necessity may be avoided by the appellee\u2019s assent to the filing of the appellant\u2019s case, as part of the record and the appeal then heard upon it. We therefore grant the application for the writ of certiorari, to the end that an opportunity may be offered to the, parties to file the appellant\u2019s case, without addition or change, to come with the record in response to the requirements of the writ, and this can only be with the assent of the appellee.\nLet the writ issue as prayed for on the terms preseribed'by law.\nPer Curiam. Certiorari ordered.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "SMITH, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. Armistead Jones, for plaintiff.",
      "No counsel for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CATHARINE G. SHELTON v. SARAH L. SHELTON.\nAppeal \u2014 New Trial where Judge retires from office.\nWhere a judge goes out of office before preparing a case on appeal, a new trial will be awarded unless the parties agree upon a statement of the case. The certiorari applied for is granted to afford the parties an opportunity to adjust their differences in the premises.\nPETITION for certiorari heard at October Term, 1883, of The SupreME Court.\nMr. Armistead Jones, for plaintiff.\nNo counsel for defendant.\nMr. Justice MERitniox, having been of counsel, did not sit on the hearing of this case."
  },
  "file_name": "0185-01",
  "first_page_order": 201,
  "last_page_order": 202
}