{
  "id": 11276247,
  "name": "Doe on demise of Stamps and others v. Irvine",
  "name_abbreviation": "Doe on demise of Stamps v. Irvine",
  "decision_date": "1822-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "232",
  "last_page": "233",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hawks 232"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "9 N.C. 232"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 155,
    "char_count": 1952,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.398,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 3.603574320463348e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8878471293114
    },
    "sha256": "76867938692dd691ea16f0294068e154f1140c1aa4df07fbe556f96cf16e7ecd",
    "simhash": "1:02ce8eb11f2eb646",
    "word_count": 343
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:20:49.892283+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Doe on demise of Stamps and others v. Irvine."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Hall, Judge.\nThe execution binds the property in the hands of the Defendant, and all others claiming under him from the time that it bears tesie. \u2014 (1 Term R. 729. 1 Salk. 320. 1 Ld. Ray. 252. 1 Comyn\u2019s 35. 16 East 278, note.) \u00cd therefore think the rule, for a new I rial should be discharged.\nBy the Court. \u2014 Rule discharged.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Hall, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Murphey for the appellant. \u2014 Ruffin for the appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Doe on demise of Stamps and others v. Irvine.\nFrom Caswell.\nAn execution binds property in tlie hands of the Defendant, and all others claiming under him from the teste.\nEjectment for a lot of land in the town of Milton. The facts of the case were as follows : One James Daniel being seised and possessed of the lot in question, became indebted to the Bank of Newbern, and for the payment of this debt the Defendant Irvine became security. A judgment was obtained at the instance of the Bank against said Daniel, in the County Court of Caswell, which met on the second Monday of October, 1820, On the 1st of November following, a fi. fa. issued on said judgment, which was tested on the second Monday of October \u2022, by virtue of this fi. fa. the Sheriff levied on the property in dispute, and returned the execution to January, 1821. A writ of venditioni exponas was then issued, under which the Sheriff exposed the lot to sale, and the lessors of the Plaintiff became the purchasers. James Daniel, for the purpose of indemnifying his surety, the Defendant Irvine, on the 17th of October 1820, which was subsequent to the judgment obtained in Caswell County Court, conveyed the land, which is the foundation of this suit, to one Ogilby, in trust to indemnify Irvine and Ogilby, as trustee, conveyed the same to the Defendant Irvine, after .January, 1821, but previous to the sale by the Sheriff under the writ of venditioni eximias. A judgment war. rendered for the Plaintiff in the Court below, whereupon the Defendant appealed.5\nMurphey for the appellant. \u2014 Ruffin for the appellee.\nThe case was submitted without argument."
  },
  "file_name": "0232-01",
  "first_page_order": 214,
  "last_page_order": 215
}