{
  "id": 8698603,
  "name": "ROWLAND BROTHERS v. R. J. MITCHELL & SON",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rowland Bros. v. R. J. Mitchell & Son",
  "decision_date": "1884-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "649",
  "last_page": "650",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "90 N.C. 649"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "83 N. C., 685",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11279098
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/83/0685-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "83 N. C., 685",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11279098
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/83/0685-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 104,
    "char_count": 1121,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.507,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.248261658274493e-07,
      "percentile": 0.9149620306048731
    },
    "sha256": "9afd8058f8aa773aabf212f7c7230deedeba0817bce3178358862e7bc927ea86",
    "simhash": "1:1c527e7b9894901d",
    "word_count": 189
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:11:38.032493+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ROWLAND BROTHERS v. R. J. MITCHELL & SON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Smith, C. J.\nThe transcript of the record before us certified to be \u201cfull and accurate,\u201d contains only the judgment rendered in the superior court, reciting that the case comes up on appeal from a justice\u2019s court, the case embodying the exceptions signed by the respective counsel, and the appeal undertaking.\nThere is no process, nor waiver, nor pleading by -which we can see that the cause was properly constituted in the superior court, nor, except from the case, what was the subject of contention.\nWe cannot assume jurisdiction upon such a record, and must,, according to the rules for such imperfections, remand the cause. Weil v. Everitt, 83 N. C., 685.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Smith, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. J. B. Batchelor and L. C. Fdwards, for plaintiff",
      "No counsel for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ROWLAND BROTHERS v. R. J. MITCHELL & SON.\nAppeal, cause remanded.\nWhere a transcript on appeal contains only the judgment of the court below, and shows no process or pleading, the cause will be remanded.\n(Weil v. Everilt, 83 N. C., 685, cited and approved).\nAppeal from a judgment rendered at Fall Term, 1883, of GraNVILLE Superior Court, by MacRae, J.\nThe plaintiff appealed.\nMessrs. J. B. Batchelor and L. C. Fdwards, for plaintiff\nNo counsel for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0649-01",
  "first_page_order": 665,
  "last_page_order": 666
}