{
  "id": 8695919,
  "name": "JAMES W. GRANT, Adm'r, v. JOSEPH J. BELL",
  "name_abbreviation": "Grant v. Bell",
  "decision_date": "1884-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "495",
  "last_page": "496",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "91 N.C. 495"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "78 N. C., 35",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8684119
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/78/0035-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "73 N. C., 273",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8690285
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/73/0273-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "69 N. C., 212",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        2085452
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/69/0212-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "90 N. C., 558",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8698292
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/90/0558-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "87 N. C., 34",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8684201
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/87/0034-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "78 N. C., 35",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8684119
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/78/0035-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 191,
    "char_count": 2462,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.519,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2080897380503651
    },
    "sha256": "df21134fa7935dce92e6cf59aa6e3136aa09c0f634077e0c8813f773dfcc0d51",
    "simhash": "1:6a001a753007bfcb",
    "word_count": 450
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:07:30.396726+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JAMES W. GRANT, Adm\u2019r, v. JOSEPH J. BELL."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Merrimon, J.\nThis appeal came into this court at October term, 1880, and has been here continuously ever since. See Grant v. Bell, 87 N. C., 34, and 90 N. C., 558.\nAt the present term it is made to appear to this court that the defendant has died since the last terra, leaving a last will and testament; that the same has been duly proved, and that R. 0. Edwards has qualified as executor thereof.\nThe death of the defendant is suggested and the executor \u25a0 comes and asks that he be made a party defendant in the place of his testator, and be allowed to file an answer, denying that he has assets, &c.\nIt appears from the record that the canse of action survives, and that the suit is not for the recovery of a penalty or damages merely vindictive. The case is a proper one in which to allow the executor to be made a party defendant, and the motion in this respect is allowed.\nThe proposed answer is not a proper pleading in this action. The question of assets dr no assets does not arise in it. IUthe plaintiff shall obtain judgment for his debt, such judgment will only ascertain his debt, and it will share in the settlement of the estate, according to its dignity, in the assets that are or may come into the hands of the executor to pay the debts. The Code, \u00a7 1470; Vaughan v. Stephenson, 69 N. C., 212; Dunn v. Barnes, 73 N. C., 273; Holmes v. Foster, 78 N. C., 35.\n8o much of the executor\u2019s motion as asks to be allowed to file an answer must be denied. Let an order be drawn accordingly.\nJudgment accordingly.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Merrimon, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. R. B. Peebles and T. N.Hill, for plaintiff.",
      "Messrs. Mullen & Moore, Day & Zollicoffer and J. B. Batchelor for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JAMES W. GRANT, Adm\u2019r, v. JOSEPH J. BELL.\nAccount and Settlement \u2014 Executors and Administra,tors.\nIn an action for an account and settlement, the death of the' defendant being suggested, his executor comes in and is made a party defendant and moves for leave to file an answer denying that he has assets; Meld, that the question of assets does not arise here, and the motion' cannot be allowed. If plaintiff obtains judgment, it only ascertains the debt which must share in the assets that may come into the executor\u2019s hands, according to its dignity, when the estate is settled.\n(Holmes v. Foster, 78 N. C., 35, and eases cited, approved.)\nCivil Action for account and settlement, tried at Spring-Term, 1880, of Northampton Superior Court, before Oudger, J.\nMessrs. R. B. Peebles and T. N.Hill, for plaintiff.\nMessrs. Mullen & Moore, Day & Zollicoffer and J. B. Batchelor for defendant.\nSmith, C. J., did not sit on the hearing of this case."
  },
  "file_name": "0495-01",
  "first_page_order": 509,
  "last_page_order": 510
}