{
  "id": 8652684,
  "name": "STATE v. OSCAR PICKETT",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Pickett",
  "decision_date": "1886-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "971",
  "last_page": "972",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "94 N.C. 971"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 94,
    "char_count": 1171,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.524,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.0011153170616546e-08,
      "percentile": 0.315620524594291
    },
    "sha256": "39812b8cb458cf1d270f31f345c7f5d6674ad9829e97a32f39eddb7336380fdc",
    "simhash": "1:1749c736d0ae0a64",
    "word_count": 203
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:44:11.219650+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. OSCAR PICKETT."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Meeeimon, J.\nFor the purpose of the motion to dismiss this appeal, this case is in all material inspects like that of State v. McMillan, decided at this Term, except that the appellant here was convicted of the crime of larceny. We think that what we said in that case, applies to, and embraces one like this. The motion to dismiss the appeal must therefore be denied.\nMotion denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Meeeimon, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General, for the State.",
      "Mr. John D. Shaw, for the defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. OSCAR PICKETT.\nWhere a defendant, convicted of larceny, escaped pending the appeal, the appeal \u25a0will not be dismissed, but will be continued, to be called up for argument either by the prisoner or the State, when he shall be re-taken\n(State v. McMillan, at this Term, cited and approved.)\nMotion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal, heard at February Term, 1886, of the Supreme Court.\nThe defendant was convicted at January Term, 1884, of the Superior Court of Robeson county, before MacTlae, Judge, of the crime of- larceny,- and pending his appeal, escaped from custody.\nThe appeal was continued from Term to Term in this Court, until the February Term, 1886, when the State moved to dismiss it.\nAttorney General, for the State.\nMr. John D. Shaw, for the defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0971-01",
  "first_page_order": 1011,
  "last_page_order": 1012
}