{
  "id": 11273844,
  "name": "JOHN BURGESS et als. v. E. J. KIRBY et als.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Burgess v. Kirby",
  "decision_date": "1886-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "276",
  "last_page": "276",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "95 N.C. 276"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "94 N. C., 333",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8651005
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/94/0333-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "94 N. C., 333",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8651005
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/94/0333-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 98,
    "char_count": 1085,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.521,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.23915641413843047
    },
    "sha256": "a158c3dfc519875143804a89cd5026fa406bbe792efe1c7f629a06d6d8307e1a",
    "simhash": "1:dcc22dae6cb6ca5e",
    "word_count": 180
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:25:31.449463+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JOHN BURGESS et als. v. E. J. KIRBY et als."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "MerrimoN, J.\nThe plaintiffs in the above named case, appealed to this Court. Their appeal was heard and determined' at the last Term, and the action was dismissed. It hence becomes unnecessary to decide the qu\u00e9stion presented by the present, the defendants\u2019 appeal. Indeed, it turns out that this appeal was unnecessary, and it must therefore be dismissed, as having-been improvidently taken. Davenport v. McKee, 94 N. C., 333,\nDismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "MerrimoN, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. D. G. Fowle and John W. Graham, for the plaintiffs..",
      "Mr. B. H. Battle, for the defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JOHN BURGESS et als. v. E. J. KIRBY et als.\nAppeal.\nWhen both parties appeal, and the judgment on the plaintiffs\u2019 appeal disposes of the questions presented by both, the defendants\u2019 appeal will he dismissed, as having been improvidently taken.\n{Davenport v. McKee, 94 N. C., 333, cited and approved).\nCivil ACTION, tried before Gilmer, Judge, and a jury, at January Special Term, 1886, of Durham Superior Court.\nBoth parties appealed from the judgment of the Court below, and the plaintiffs\u2019 appeal was disposed of at the last Term of this Court.\nMessrs. D. G. Fowle and John W. Graham, for the plaintiffs..\nMr. B. H. Battle, for the defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0276-01",
  "first_page_order": 302,
  "last_page_order": 302
}