{
  "id": 11275340,
  "name": "STATE v. WILLIAM MOODY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Moody",
  "decision_date": "1886-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "656",
  "last_page": "658",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "95 N.C. 656"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 322,
    "char_count": 5421,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.433,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.1850200046748689e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5896525241432995
    },
    "sha256": "a65c8a495535881da948aded80325db17599c65e87174552fe653316e6a87c8e",
    "simhash": "1:c477c01b7e1c12ed",
    "word_count": 928
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:25:31.449463+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. WILLIAM MOODY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Merrimon, J.\nThe statute (Acts 187(5-77, ch. 260,) provides : \u201c That it shall be unlawful for any person or persons to sell, or directly or indirectly to receive any compensation for any spirituous liquors, bitters or intoxicating drinks * ***** within the county of Dare,\u201d and makes any such sale a misdemeanor. This statute was modified by a subsequent one, (Acts Special Session 1881, ch. 38, \u00a71), by adding after the word \u201cDare,\u201d the additional words, \u201cexcept at Nag\u2019s Head Hotel during the months of June, July, August and September.\u201d It will be observed that at first this statute, both in its terms and scope, was broad, definite and positive; it forbade absolutely the said of intoxicating beverages within the county named. The amendment of it above set forth, is exceptive and restrictive; its terms are plain and positive and leaves nothing to interpretation. It permits a sale of such liquors and drinks, not continuously and generally throughout the county, but only for a speci-fi ed period in each year, not at or within an indefinite locality, but at a particular specified place. There is a manifest intent to guard carefully the exception provided \u2014 to allow such sales only at one place plainly designated by name, where they would most conveniently serve the purpose of supplying people who might resort thither during the period prescribed, with spirituous liquors, and where such sales would most likely be under careful supervision and control. Otherwise the language employed would have been broader and more indefinite in its meaning and application, as \u201c except at Nag\u2019s Head,\u201d a well known locality, or \u201c at Hotels at Nag\u2019s Head.\u201d The restrictive purpose is too plain to be mistaken, and to allow the latitudinous interpretation of the language employed, contended for by the counsel of the appellant.\nThe plain meaning of the statute as amended is to allow such sales to be made by one or more persons within the period prescribed, \u201cat Nag\u2019s Head Hotel,\u201d the house known by that name at the time the statute was passed, the person or persons selling, first having obtained a license to sell, as required by the general statutes of the State on the subject of selling spirituous liquors. \u201cAt Nag\u2019s Head Hotel\u201d does not mean, as contended, \u201c at Nag\u2019s Head,\u201d or thereabouts, or about or near to the hotel named. It means on the premises connected with, and forming part of that hotel. One or more persons might have a license to sell there.\nThe county commissioners of the county named had no authority to grant a license to the .appellant, or any other person, to sell spirituous liquors at Nag\u2019s Plead as a locality, or at any other place in the county of Dare, except at \u201c Nag\u2019s Head Hotel.\u201d Tho appellant had no license to sell at the latter place. His supposed license to sell at \u201cNag\u2019s Head \u201d was inoperative and void, and therefore could not avail him as a defence. The license did not profess to allow such sales \u201cat Nag\u2019s Plead Hotel,\u201d; the sales were not made on the premises of the latter hotel, and the fact that the appellant called his hotel by its name was only a puerile subterfuge, without the slightest legal effect. It appears that the appellant sold spirituous liquors in the county of Dare at a place other than \u201c at Nag\u2019s Head Hotel,\u201d within, the county named. Pie was therefore properly convicted.\nLet this opinion be certified to the Superior Court, to the end that further proceedings may be had in the action according to law.\nNo error. Affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Merrimon, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General, for the State.",
      "Mr. Aydleft, for the defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. WILLIAM MOODY.\nLicense \u2014 Liquor\u2014Statute.\n1. The commissioners of Dare county, under the Act of 1876-V7, cli. 260, as amended by ch. 38 Laws Special Session of 1880, have no power to grant licenses to sell spirituous liquors except \u201cat Nag\u2019s Head Hotel during the months of June, July, August and September.\u201d\n3. The words \u201c at Nag\u2019s Head Hotel \u201d mean the locality of the premises forming- part of or used with the building generally known by that name at the time of the enactment of the statute.\nThis ivas an indictment for retailing spirituous liquors, tried at Spring Term, 1886, of Dake Superior Court, before Shepherd,, Judge.\nThe jury returned a special verdict in which the following-facts were found:\nAn act was passed by the General Assembly at its session in 1876-77, (ch.260), prohibiting the sale of spirituous liquors in the county of Dare; at the special session of 1880, (ch. 38). the act of 1876-77 was amended to permit the sale of such liquors at Nag\u2019s Head Hotel, during the months of June, July, August and September. On the __ day of-1885, the defendant ivas granted by the commissioners of Dare county, a license to sell liquors \u201c at Nag\u2019s Head \u201d during the said months. Nag\u2019s Head comprises a territory two or three miles in length and about a mile in width. The Nag\u2019s Head Hotel is situated on the Sound side of the territory known as Nag\u2019s Head. Under the license issued to him as aforesaid, the defendant occupied a house with seven or eight rooms, some 250 or 300 yards from the Nag\u2019s Head Hotel, and opened a hotel, and retailed liquors there during the month of June, July, August and September of 1885. He placed a sign upon this building with these words upon it, \u201c Naa\u2019s Head Hotel.\u201d \u25a0\nTlie Court being of opinion that the defendant was guilty upon the special verdict, so adjudged, from which the defendant appealed.\nAttorney-General, for the State.\nMr. Aydleft, for the defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0656-01",
  "first_page_order": 682,
  "last_page_order": 684
}