{
  "id": 8650424,
  "name": "C. B. JUSTICE v. THE CAROLINA CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Justice v. Carolina Central Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1887-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "412",
  "last_page": "412",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "96 N.C. 412"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "94 N. C., 523",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "92 N. C., 847",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "94 N. C., 523",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 100,
    "char_count": 1049,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.471,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.770845263994211e-08,
      "percentile": 0.41472514420724915
    },
    "sha256": "69be2ec07ada3eedfdc01492c0457a48e293d50926a7b6eae7615f9c018e56b5",
    "simhash": "1:fc21c560ee0d3e20",
    "word_count": 188
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:06:29.974118+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "C. B. JUSTICE v. THE CAROLINA CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Davis, J.\nThe defendant appellee moves the Court to affirm the judgment rendered in the Court below, upon the ground that no exceptions were taken and no errors assigned for consideration and review by this Court.\nNo errors are pointed out or assigned in the record, and upon a careful examination we can find none.\nWe call the attention of the profession to the suggestion of Merrimon, Judge, in the case of Lytle v. Lytle, 94 N. C., 523, in regard to appeals, and to rule 7, to be found in 92 N. C., 847.\nIn this case the judgment below must be affirmed. Let this be certified.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Davis, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. Theo. F. Davidson, for the plaintiff.",
      "Messrs. W. P. Bynum and E. G. Smith, for the defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "C. B. JUSTICE v. THE CAROLINA CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY.\nAppeal \u2014 Assignment of Errors.\nWhere no errors are assigned, and none appear upon the face of tile record, the judgment will be affirmed.\n(Lytle v. Lytle, 94 N. C., 523; cited and approved).\nMotioN by the defendant appellee to affirm the judgment below, made at February Term, 1887, of the Supreme Court.\nMr. Theo. F. Davidson, for the plaintiff.\nMessrs. W. P. Bynum and E. G. Smith, for the defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0412-01",
  "first_page_order": 438,
  "last_page_order": 438
}