{
  "id": 1588697,
  "name": "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George A. CORTEZ, a/k/a George Robert Cortez, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Cortez",
  "decision_date": "1983-05-24",
  "docket_number": "No. 5587",
  "first_page": "666",
  "last_page": "667",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "100 N.M. 666"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "674 P.2d 1126"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M. Ct. App.",
    "id": 9025,
    "name": "Court of Appeals of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "100 N.M. 158",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        1588537
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/100/0158-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1184,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.803,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.059509454026084145
    },
    "sha256": "de7de916663acac760f70521c724b243e5fc0f9f54a7409b3cbca3f4d60c0b20",
    "simhash": "1:96416dad01332922",
    "word_count": 188
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:45:38.267108+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "WOOD and LOPEZ, JJ., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George A. CORTEZ, a/k/a George Robert Cortez, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION ON REMAND\nWALTERS, Chief Judge.\nThe Supreme Court granted certiorari in this case, and on February 3, 1983, 100 N.M. 158, 667 P.2d 963, reversed the majority opinion and adopted the opinion of Judge Wood as the opinion of the Supreme Court. The file was returned to this court on May 17, 1983. Among the matters discussed by Judge Wood was his satisfaction that the evidence was sufficient to show an intent to distribute cocaine. On remand we are directed to address that issue.\nThe Supreme Court having adopted Judge Wood\u2019s opinion, we are constrained to and do hold that the evidence was sufficient to support defendant\u2019s conviction on that charge.\nThe judgment and sentence on all counts is affirmed. IT IS SO ORDERED.\nWOOD and LOPEZ, JJ., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "WALTERS, Chief Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Paul Bardacke, Atty. Gen., William Lazar, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.",
      "Winston Roberts-Hohl, Singleton & Roberts-Hohl, Santa Fe, Driggers & Driggers, Las Cruces, for defendant-appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "674 P.2d 1126\nSTATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George A. CORTEZ, a/k/a George Robert Cortez, Defendant-Appellant.\nNo. 5587.\nCourt of Appeals of New Mexico.\nMay 24, 1983.\nCertiorari Denied July 22, 1983.\nPaul Bardacke, Atty. Gen., William Lazar, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.\nWinston Roberts-Hohl, Singleton & Roberts-Hohl, Santa Fe, Driggers & Driggers, Las Cruces, for defendant-appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0666-01",
  "first_page_order": 698,
  "last_page_order": 699
}