{
  "id": 206025,
  "name": "N. NASH, Appellee, v. A. L. MORGAN, et al., Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Nash v. Morgan",
  "decision_date": "1910-01-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 1252",
  "first_page": "258",
  "last_page": "258",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "15 N.M. 258"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M.",
    "id": 8835,
    "name": "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 70,
    "char_count": 616,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.486,
    "sha256": "91b82c6853d1e33bfc6111eca6b56c1e2e35a2c9d4d017ae4f9297be461cae22",
    "simhash": "1:d6e25bb786780f05",
    "word_count": 106
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:23:53.621983+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "N. NASH, Appellee, v. A. L. MORGAN, et al., Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION OP THE COURT.\nMECHEM, J.\nIt was agreed that this case and No. 1249 (Joseph C. Baldridge v. A. L. Morgan, et al.), involving similar facts and the same legal questions should be considered on the briefs filed- in the foregoing case, and that the opinion rendered by the court should be decisive of each case'. The briefs and opinion are on file in No. 1249.\nThe judgment of the District Court is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "MECHEM, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Marr\u00f3n & Wood for-Appellee.",
      "Neill B. Field for Appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "[No. 1252,\nJanuary 6, 1910.]\nN. NASH, Appellee, v. A. L. MORGAN, et al., Appellants.\nAppeal from District Court for Bernalillo County.\nAffirmed.\nMarr\u00f3n & Wood for-Appellee.\nNeill B. Field for Appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0258-01",
  "first_page_order": 338,
  "last_page_order": 338
}