{
  "id": 4705271,
  "name": "J. M. PALMER, Plaintiff in Error, vs. FRANK B. ALLEN, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Palmer v. Allen",
  "decision_date": "1914-06-15",
  "docket_number": "No. 1655",
  "first_page": "175",
  "last_page": "176",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "19 N.M. 175"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M.",
    "id": 8835,
    "name": "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "124 Pac. 2",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "P.",
      "case_ids": [
        8885057
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/okla/31/0821-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "94 Pac. 945",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "P.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "24 Pac. 2",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "P.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "136 Pac. 216",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "P.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "138 Pac. 300",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "P.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "138 Pac. 200",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "P.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "134 Pac. 216",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "P.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 190,
    "char_count": 2364,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.477,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15287841105794198
    },
    "sha256": "11931bda519dbf4a97fdd3c76a82691c75eeacb39f5eb0ae96fffdf3761cd03a",
    "simhash": "1:c96043bda09fa19d",
    "word_count": 431
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:47:32.860859+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. M. PALMER, Plaintiff in Error, vs. FRANK B. ALLEN, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION.\nROBERTS, C. J.\nThe writ of error herein was sued out on the 8th day of January, A. D. 1914. Plaintiff in error failed to file a cost bond within thirty days as required by Sec. 14, Chap. 57, S. L. 1907, and on February 17th, thereafter, defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss the action and quash the writ of error because plaintiff in error had failed .to comply with the statute in that regard. Under the rule announced by this court in the case of Farmers\u2019 Development Co. vs. Rayado Land & Irrigation Co. 134 Pac. 216, and Canavan vs. Canavan, 138 Pac. 200, we are compelled to sustain the motion. In the Canavan case we held that the appellee or defendant in error could waive the giving of a cost bond, and that he does so where he appears and interposes no objection to the irregularity. In this case, however, there is no waiver, as defendant in error has never appeared for any purpose, except to ask a dismissal of the cause because no bond has been filed. Plaintiff in error argues that defendant in error, by asking that the writ of error be quashed, has appeared generally and to the merits. There is no merit in this contention, because it is apparent that defendant was seeking to secure only the dismissal of the writ of error on the sole ground of plaintiff\u2019s failure to comply with the statutory requirement as to the giving of a cost bond.\nFor the reasons stated, the cause will be dismissed, and it is so ordered.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "ROBERTS, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. M. Palmer and Perkins & Main, for Plaintiff in Error.",
      "Frank A. Burdick, for Denfendant in Error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1655,\nJune 15, 1914)\nJ. M. PALMER, Plaintiff in Error, vs. FRANK B. ALLEN, Defendant in Error.\nSYLLABUS BY THE COURT.\nI. Where plaintiff in error fails to file a cost bond within thirty days, after suing out such writ of error, as required by Section 14, Chapter 57, S. L. 1907, and such default has not been waived by defendant in error, the court will, upon motion, dismiss the writ of error.\nP. 176\nError to District Court, San Juan County, Edmund C. Abbott, Presiding Judge.\nDismissed.\nJ. M. Palmer and Perkins & Main, for Plaintiff in Error.\nValuation. 70.Pac. 603; 105 D. S. 45; S. C. 36th Law Ed- 135.\nSUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF PLAINTIFF.\nMotion to Permit Plaintiff to File Cost Bond. 138 Pac. 300.\nFrank A. Burdick, for Denfendant in Error.\nMotion that writ of error issued be quashed and action dismissed.' 136 Pac. 216; 24 Pac. 2.\nREPLY BRIEF OF PLAINTIFF.\nMotion to quash writ. 94 Pac. 945; 124 Pac. 2."
  },
  "file_name": "0175-01",
  "first_page_order": 215,
  "last_page_order": 216
}