{
  "id": 4714858,
  "name": "WARREN v. KORNEGAY et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Warren v. Kornegay",
  "decision_date": "1915-03-31",
  "docket_number": "No. 1728",
  "first_page": "225",
  "last_page": "226",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "20 N.M. 225"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M.",
    "id": 8835,
    "name": "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "113 Pac. 848",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "P.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "16 N. M. 86",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        4683454
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/16/0086-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 105,
    "char_count": 956,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.472,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.871714490707454e-08,
      "percentile": 0.49912099122381265
    },
    "sha256": "d2e4a52bbc2c5de27155d609359ddbe3b4f468047eaf0b9723a96487b509d6a8",
    "simhash": "1:61f3b2802e38fd54",
    "word_count": 158
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:28:16.553126+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Roberts, C. J., and Parker, J., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "WARREN v. KORNEGAY et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION OP THE COURT.\nMECIiEM, District Judge.\n\u2014 Counsel for appellant raises but one point, namely, that the judgment of the lower court is not sustained by a preponderance of the evidence. The trial judge heard the cause upon depositions and testimony-taken 'by an examiner. Following the practice as announced in Gallup Electric Light Co. v. Pacific Improvement Co., 16 N. M. 86, 113 Pac. 848, we have reviewed the entire record as if trying the case in the first instance, and upon such review our conclusions differ in no wise from those of the trial court. - -\nJudgment of the lower court is affirmed.\nRoberts, C. J., and Parker, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "MECIiEM, District Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "-James A. Hall of Portales, for appellant.",
      "T. E..Mears of Portales, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "[No. 1728,\nMarch 31, 1915.]\nWARREN v. KORNEGAY et al.\nAppeal' from District Court, Roosevelt County; McClure, Judge.\nAction by R. II. Warren against R. Kornegay and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.\nAffirmed.\n-James A. Hall of Portales, for appellant.\nT. E..Mears of Portales, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0225-01",
  "first_page_order": 241,
  "last_page_order": 242
}