{
  "id": 8512740,
  "name": "ESCHLIMAN v. VERNON et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Eschliman v. Vernon",
  "decision_date": "1918-03-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 2050",
  "first_page": "332",
  "last_page": "333",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "24 N.M. 332"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M.",
    "id": 8835,
    "name": "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "170 Pac. 743",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "P.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "23 N. M. 616",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        2395718
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/23/0616-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "170 Pac. 743",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "P.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 105,
    "char_count": 963,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.475,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20537606632664684
    },
    "sha256": "fe3e75db020e724572169be0822ccd9c469d9be94a5fc099e6bc62656692c0f5",
    "simhash": "1:9939489d58b152a4",
    "word_count": 163
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:51:01.531347+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "PARKER and Roberts, JJ., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "ESCHLIMAN v. VERNON et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION OF THE COURT.\nHANNA, C. J.\nThis case involves the constitutionality of chapter 94, Laws 1909, known as the \u201cHerd Law.\u201d . Tbe trial court beld. tbe act valid, and entered 'judgment lor appellee. Tbe objections urged to tbe act were fully considered by this court in tbe recent case of Scarbrough v. Wooten, 23 N. M. 616, 170 Pac. 743, decided at tbe present term. Adhering to that opinion, tbe judgment in this case will be affirmed; and it is so ordered.\nPARKER and Roberts, JJ., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "HANNA, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "\u25a0 CatroN & CatroN, of Santa Fe, for appellants.",
      "H. H. McElroy, of Tucumcari, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "[No. 2050,\nMarch 6, 1918.]\nESCHLIMAN v. VERNON et al.\nSYLLABUS BY THE COURT.\nChapter 94, Laws 1909, known, as the \u201cHerd Law,\u201d was a constitutional enactment. Scarbrough v. Wooten, 170 Pac. 743, adhered to.\nAppeal from District Court, Quay County; Leib, Judge.\nAction by D. R. Eschliman against W. R. Yernon and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.\nAffirmed.\n\u25a0 CatroN & CatroN, of Santa Fe, for appellants.\nH. H. McElroy, of Tucumcari, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0332-01",
  "first_page_order": 350,
  "last_page_order": 351
}