{
  "id": 8841530,
  "name": "ROBERSON, Treasurer, v. MOISE BROS. CO.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Roberson v. Moise Bros.",
  "decision_date": "1920-05-27",
  "docket_number": "No. 2427",
  "first_page": "174",
  "last_page": "175",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "26 N.M. 174"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M.",
    "id": 8835,
    "name": "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "190 Pac. 353",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "P.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "26 N. M. 171",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        8841519
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/26/0171-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 175,
    "char_count": 2405,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.494,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.21128780094901287
    },
    "sha256": "a227e62bfc4516a69125d9f3b8bb74542b1acb48ff78b2edc3f94c660926444d",
    "simhash": "1:96d795048442920a",
    "word_count": 406
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:22:50.000587+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Pabker, C. J.; and BayNouds, J., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "ROBERSON, Treasurer, v. MOISE BROS. CO."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION OP THE COURT.\nROBERTS, J.\nThis is a companion case to No. 2426, Harry H. Roberson, Treasurer, v. Citizens\u2019 Lumber Co., 26 N. M. 171, 190 Pac. 353, and a like motion is interposed by appellant to strike certain portions of the transcript. The same inexcusable negligence in preparing the transcript in this case existed on the part of the clerk of the district court and the attorney for appellant, but the defect in this transcript of record which precludes a consideration of the ease by this court is because of the following:\nThe parties stipulated in the lower court as follows:\n\u201cComes How the respective attorneys in the above-entitled cause and stipulate that the findings and conclusion in cause\nNo. 1002, Harry R. Roberson, Treasurer of the Village of Santa Rosa, New Mexico, Plaintiff, v. The Citizens\u2019 Lumber Company, Defendant, as to the issues of fact and questions of law shall be accepted in this suit, both cases being similar in the issues raised. The right of appeal is reserved, by both parties.\u201d\nThey have failed to incorporate in this transcript of record the findings and conclusions in the case referred to, and the evidence introduced in that case is not brought into this record. For this reason there is nothing here for consideration, even if we should assume that the certificate of the clerk shows sufficiently the filing of the papers referred to in the office of the clerk of the district court.\nThe appeal in this case will therefore be dismissed; and it is so ordered.\nPabker, C. J.; and BayNouds, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "ROBERTS, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. T. BROTHERS, of Santa Rosa, for appellant.",
      "F. Fairoloth, of1 Santa Rosa, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 2427.\nMay 27, 1920.)\n(Rehearing Denied July 1, 1920.)\nROBERSON, Treasurer, v. MOISE BROS. CO.\nSYLLABUS BY THE COURT.\nWhere parties to a cause in the district court stipulated that the findings and conclusions in another case shall be accepted as the findings and conclusions of law in the case covered by the stipulation, there is no question for consideration on appeal from a judgment in the latter case, in the absence of the findings and conclusions of law in the cause which the stipulation provided should control.\nAppeal' from District Court, Guadalupe County; Edwin Mecheon, Judge.\nSuit by Harry R. Roberson, Treasurer of the Village of Santa Rosa, N. \u2022 M., against Moise Bros. Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.\nAppeal dismissed.\nW. T. BROTHERS, of Santa Rosa, for appellant.\nF. Fairoloth, of1 Santa Rosa, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0174-01",
  "first_page_order": 190,
  "last_page_order": 191
}