{
  "id": 8841544,
  "name": "COENETT v. FULFEB",
  "name_abbreviation": "Coenett v. Fulfeb",
  "decision_date": "1919-12-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 2384",
  "first_page": "175",
  "last_page": "176",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "26 N.M. 175"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M.",
    "id": 8835,
    "name": "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 126,
    "char_count": 1397,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.497,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.621017481241883e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4905921156021065
    },
    "sha256": "6db90cf50911acd36ba9bc69a4ffbf1117611f7957610bc36fe6ba87538c8aa4",
    "simhash": "1:411f75b6922ac9f2",
    "word_count": 233
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:22:50.000587+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "COENETT v. FULFEB."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION OF THE COURT.\nPABltEB, C. J.\nThe record in this case does not contain either a final judgment or an interlocutory judgment, order, or decision practically disposing of the merits of the case. The record does contain a memorandum opinion of the trial court upon a proposition of law, but nothing else in the nature of a judgment. -The memorandum opinion recites that an order may be prepared in accordance therewith; but, if any order or judgment was prepared, it was omitted from the record on this appeal.\nAppeals are allowed in all civil actions from final' judgments, and from such interlocutory judgments, orders, and decisions as practically dispose of the merits of the action. Sections 1 and 2, chapter 43, Laws 1917. As there is no judgment, order, or decision, final or interlocutory, contained in the record, the motion of ap-pellee to dismiss the appeal is granted; and it is so ordered.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PABltEB, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "B. A. PreNtioe, of Tucumcari, for appellant.",
      "J. E. Pardue and T. M. Noble, both of Ft. Sumner, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 2384.\nDec. 4, 1919.)\nCOENETT v. FULFEB.\nSYLLABUS BY THE COURT.\nWhere record falls to disclose a judgment, order, or decision, final or interlocutory, the appeal will be dismissed upon motion therefor.\nAppeal from District Court, De Baca County; Bich-ardson, Judge.\nAction by J. H. Cornett against J. P. Fulfer. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.\nAppeal dismissed.\nB. A. PreNtioe, of Tucumcari, for appellant.\nJ. E. Pardue and T. M. Noble, both of Ft. Sumner, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0175-01",
  "first_page_order": 191,
  "last_page_order": 192
}