{
  "id": 8841785,
  "name": "KEMP et al. v. WILLIAMS et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Kemp v. Williams",
  "decision_date": "1924-12-22",
  "docket_number": "No. 2904",
  "first_page": "299",
  "last_page": "300",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "30 N.M. 299"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M.",
    "id": 8835,
    "name": "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "219 P. 491",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "P.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "29 N. M. 140",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        8841429
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/29/0140-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "216 P. 498",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "P.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "28 N. M. 606",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        8843339
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/28/0606-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 189,
    "char_count": 1938,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.505,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.76351521722866e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4952628512318672
    },
    "sha256": "8f0bfe85b3105ba9838b8abeee07f3c7d66ec3c4252ac4a2382cc9526dd93b51",
    "simhash": "1:4dc07ba5e005a646",
    "word_count": 330
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:18:18.187975+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "BOTTS and FORT, JJ., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "KEMP et al. v. WILLIAMS et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION OF THE COURT\nPARKER, C. J.\nThis is an action for $750, the amount claimed to be due under contract for an option granted by appellee to appellant of the right to purchase certain real estate within a certain period of time. The court found:\n'\u2018That all the allegations of the plaintiff\u2019s complaint and amended complaint are true, and have been fully proven.\u201d\nThis is the only finding made by the court, and no findings were requested by appellant. At the conclusion of the judgment, an exception was inserted as follows:\n\u201cTo all of which, defendant at the time excepted.\u201d\nIt is perfectly apparent that under these circumstances. there is nothing before the court for review. The general exception above quoted presented no question to the trial court, and none of the steps or conclusions, leading up to the judgment, were called to the attention of that court as erroneous, by request for finding and conclusions, or otherwise. Under such circumstances we cannot review the alleged errors set out in the brief. See Stumpf v. Pohle, 28 N. M. 606, 216 P. 498, where many of our former cases are collected. Also Collins v. Unknown Heirs, 29 N. M. 140, 219 P. 491.\nIt follows that the judgment of the court below should be affirmed, and the cause remanded, with directions to proceed accordingly, and to enter judgment against the sureties upon appellant\u2019s supersedeas bond, and it is so ordered.\nBOTTS and FORT, JJ., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PARKER, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Geo. W. Prichard, of Santa Fe, for appellants..",
      "E. P. Davies, of Santa Fe, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 2904.\nDec. 22, 1924.\nRehearing Denied Feb. 17, 1925.)\nKEMP et al. v. WILLIAMS et al.\nSYLLABUS BY THE COURT\nQuestions not presented to the lower court will not ordinarily be considered on appeal.\nAppeal from District Court, Torrance County; Ed. Mechem, Judge.\nAction by W. C. Kemp and others against H. C. Williams and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.\nAffirmed and remanded, with directions.\nGeo. W. Prichard, of Santa Fe, for appellants..\nE. P. Davies, of Santa Fe, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0299-01",
  "first_page_order": 319,
  "last_page_order": 320
}