{
  "id": 1551502,
  "name": "STATE, Appellee, v. Clay DUNLAP et al., Appellants; SAME v. A. S. STEWART, Appellant; SAME v. Claude WELLS, Appellant; SAME v. E. A. SHEDOUDY, Appellant; SAME v. Dominic CUNICO, Appellant; SAME v. Robert L. BLEDSOE, Appellant; SAME v. J. H. SINGER, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Dunlap",
  "decision_date": "1925-12-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 2968; No. 2969; No. 2979; No. 2983; No. 2993; No. 3040; No. 3041",
  "first_page": "275",
  "last_page": "276",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "31 N.M. 275"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "242 P. 449"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M.",
    "id": 8835,
    "name": "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "242 P. 440",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "P.",
      "case_ids": [
        2015512
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/or/117/0466-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 127,
    "char_count": 1396,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.521,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.5330860471597753e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6714930098241249
    },
    "sha256": "8df32caa3525dbedae1fafd7edaed6f33850fc2f5482a86b6954e4f03d4b685c",
    "simhash": "1:7f6658cd28a07d8d",
    "word_count": 233
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:07:31.532037+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE, Appellee, v. Clay DUNLAP et al., Appellants. SAME v. A. S. STEWART, Appellant. SAME v. Claude WELLS, Appellant. SAME v. E. A. SHEDOUDY, Appellant. SAME v. Dominic CUNICO, Appellant. SAME v. Robert L. BLEDSOE, Appellant. SAME v. J. H. SINGER, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nEach of the defendants in the above-entitled causes was convicted under sections 1 and 2, c. 118, Laws, of 1923, which, as we have just held in State v. Armstrong, No. 2947, 242 P. 440, not as yet [officially] reported, are violative of section 18, art. 4, of the Constitution of this state. The judgment in each of said causes must therefore be reversed and remanded, with direction to discharge the accused.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "O. O. Askren, of Santa Fe, for appellant Dunlap.",
      "Roy Prentice, of Tucnmcari, for appellant Stewart.",
      "R. A. Ptentice, of Tncumcari, for appellant Wells.",
      "Fred J. Voorhees, of Raton, for appellant Shedoudy.",
      "PI. A. Kiker, of Raton, for appellant Cunico.",
      "Fitzhugh & Fitzhugh, of Clovis, for appellants Bledsoe and Singer:",
      "J. W. Armstrong, Atty. Gen., and J. P. Bujac, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "[242 Pac. 449.\nDec. 14, 1925.]\nSTATE, Appellee, v. Clay DUNLAP et al., Appellants. SAME v. A. S. STEWART, Appellant. SAME v. Claude WELLS, Appellant. SAME v. E. A. SHEDOUDY, Appellant. SAME v. Dominic CUNICO, Appellant. SAME v. Robert L. BLEDSOE, Appellant. SAME v. J. H. SINGER, Appellant.\n(No. 2968.)\n(No. 2969.)\n(No. 2979.)\n(No. 2983.)\n(No. 2993.)\n(No. 3040.)\n(No. 3041.)\nIn No. 2968, 2969, 2979.\nAppeal from District Court, Quay County; Leib, Judge.\nIn Nos. 2983. 2993.\nAppeal from District Court, Colfax County.\nIn Nos. 3040, 3041.\nAppeal from District Court, Curry County.\nO. O. Askren, of Santa Fe, for appellant Dunlap.\nRoy Prentice, of Tucnmcari, for appellant Stewart.\nR. A. Ptentice, of Tncumcari, for appellant Wells.\nFred J. Voorhees, of Raton, for appellant Shedoudy.\nPI. A. Kiker, of Raton, for appellant Cunico.\nFitzhugh & Fitzhugh, of Clovis, for appellants Bledsoe and Singer:\nJ. W. Armstrong, Atty. Gen., and J. P. Bujac, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State."
  },
  "file_name": "0275-01",
  "first_page_order": 289,
  "last_page_order": 290
}