[No. 3181.

No. 7, 1927.]

#### AMBROSE v. GREGORIO.

[261 Pac. 820.]

*10H. W. Yersin, of Gallup, for appellant.

H. W. Atkins, of Gallup, for appellee.

OPINION OF THE COURT

WATSON, J.

Appellant sued for an injunction. Appellee answered the complaint, and appellant filed a reply. The cause was heard upon the pleadings and the evidence. The court thereupon rendered judgment, holding that the complaint did not set forth a cause of action entitling the appellant to the injunction, dismissing the temporary injunction, and awarding costs to appellee.

To this- judgment appellant excepted and moved for an appeal, which was granted.

Several errors are here assigned, but the only one argued is that the court erred in not permitting appellant to amend his complaint. This, if it be error, is not available. Appellant made no objection or exception, aside from the general one in the judgment, and did not offer to amend nor request permission to do- so. He cannot therefore be heard to object. While under Laws 1917, c. 43, § 37, no exception is required in the trial of equity cases, the many decisions to the effect thcit error, to which the attention of the trial court was not directed in some manner, is not available on review are too familiar to require citation. This case does not seem to come within any of the exceptions to that rule.

The judgment must therefore be affirmed .

It is so ordered.

PARKER, C. J., and BICKLEY, J, concur.