{
  "id": 1580715,
  "name": "STATE of New Mexico, plaintiff in error, v. O. C. COLLIER, defendant in error",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Collier",
  "decision_date": "1949-02-11",
  "docket_number": "No. 5115",
  "first_page": "113",
  "last_page": "114",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "53 N.M. 113"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "202 P.2d 968"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M.",
    "id": 8835,
    "name": "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "53 N.M. 106",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        1580741
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/53/0106-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 118,
    "char_count": 1125,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.723,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.059190323451290015
    },
    "sha256": "440e81b79f244651b872dc4c9c4333d761d9930fb959c06858a829c69224c96a",
    "simhash": "1:7b447a0cb80da972",
    "word_count": 194
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:05:59.285071+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "BRICE, C. J., and SADLER, LUJAN, and COMPTON, JJ., concur.",
      "McGHEE, J., dissents."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE of New Mexico, plaintiff in error, v. O. C. COLLIER, defendant in error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThe same questions are presented in this case as in the case of State v. McKinley, 53 N.M. 106, 202 P.2d 964, and with which it has been consolidated for oral argument and submission. Accordingly, on the authority of the pronouncements made in the \u25a0opinion in the latter case, the judgment in this case is erroneous and should be reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court with a direction to set aside its judgment and enter an order overruling the defendants motion to quash and for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views expressed in the opinion in State v. McKinley, supra, this day decided.\nIt is so ordered.\nBRICE, C. J., and SADLER, LUJAN, and COMPTON, JJ., concur.\nMcGHEE, J., dissents.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "C. C. McCulloh, Atty. Gen., Robert V. Wellard and Walter R. Kegel, Asst. Attys. Gen.-, and Harry D. Robins, Asst. Dist. Atty., of Albuquerque, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Sam Dazzo and Rolando J. Matteucci, both of Albuquerque, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "202 P.2d 968\nSTATE of New Mexico, plaintiff in error, v. O. C. COLLIER, defendant in error.\nNo. 5115.\nSupreme Court of New Mexico.\nFeb. 11, 1949.\nC. C. McCulloh, Atty. Gen., Robert V. Wellard and Walter R. Kegel, Asst. Attys. Gen.-, and Harry D. Robins, Asst. Dist. Atty., of Albuquerque, for plaintiff in error.\nSam Dazzo and Rolando J. Matteucci, both of Albuquerque, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0113-02",
  "first_page_order": 139,
  "last_page_order": 140
}