{
  "id": 1589314,
  "name": "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William E. MATHERS, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Mathers",
  "decision_date": "1955-05-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 5882",
  "first_page": "308",
  "last_page": "308",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "59 N.M. 308"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "283 P.2d 634"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M.",
    "id": 8835,
    "name": "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "59 N.M. 284",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        1589292
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/59/0284-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 100,
    "char_count": 897,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.716,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.059538027120500076
    },
    "sha256": "70d0c16d3a918efd0f023f6b65551c2483f4aabd2bd28d239d1ffe06461cef8a",
    "simhash": "1:18edcce8a3c92626",
    "word_count": 146
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:28:37.062413+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William E. MATHERS, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThe appellant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of \u00a7 54, Ch. 139, Laws of 1953, \u00a7 64-22-2, 1953 Comp., upon information filed in the district court. The decisive .questions presented by this appeal are identical with those considered in the case of State v. Klantchnek, 59 N.M. 284, 283 P.2d 619, and the disposition of this appeal is controlled by our decision in the latter case filed this day.\nAccordingly, the conviction is affirmed.\nIt is so ordered.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Heidel & Swarthout, Lovington, for appellant.",
      "Richard H. Robinson, Atty. Gen., Willard F. Kitts, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Fred M. Standley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "283 P.2d 634\nSTATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William E. MATHERS, Defendant-Appellant.\nNo. 5882.\nSupreme Court of New Mexico.\nMay 3, 1955.\nHeidel & Swarthout, Lovington, for appellant.\nRichard H. Robinson, Atty. Gen., Willard F. Kitts, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Fred M. Standley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0308-01",
  "first_page_order": 332,
  "last_page_order": 332
}