{
  "id": 2801618,
  "name": "Ex parte Richard ESPINOZA",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ex parte Espinoza",
  "decision_date": "1964-07-13",
  "docket_number": "No. 110HC",
  "first_page": "372",
  "last_page": "372",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "74 N.M. 372"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "393 P.2d 717"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M.",
    "id": 8835,
    "name": "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 52,
    "char_count": 468,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.597,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.1995933875888662e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7642584018389149
    },
    "sha256": "76a14d7474a0034db072903ea2e618498c73db905272c66f1c65bb0d8932bc76",
    "simhash": "1:6e7646dfc2c2b43a",
    "word_count": 82
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:26:44.283414+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Ex parte Richard ESPINOZA."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM:\nThis matter coming on before the Court on petition for writ of mandamus and for free process, and the Court having considered the petition and being sufficiently advised in the premises,\nIt is ordered that petitioner be and he is hereby allowed free process herein.\nIt is further ordered that the petition for writ of mandamus be and the same is hereby denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "393 P.2d 717\nEx parte Richard ESPINOZA.\nNo. 110HC.\nSupreme Court of New Mexico.\nJuly 13, 1964."
  },
  "file_name": "0372-01",
  "first_page_order": 424,
  "last_page_order": 424
}