{
  "id": 8501520,
  "name": "Ray PROCTER and Pauline Procter, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FEZ CLUB, a corporation, Defendant-Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Procter v. Fez Club",
  "decision_date": "1966-05-09",
  "docket_number": "No. 7845",
  "first_page": "241",
  "last_page": "241",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "76 N.M. 241"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "414 P.2d 219"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M.",
    "id": 8835,
    "name": "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "76 N.M. 299",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        8501923
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/76/0299-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "75 N.M. 632",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        5371155
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/75/0632-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "75 N.M. 219",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        5376987
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/75/0219-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 125,
    "char_count": 1233,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.671,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.1289166776858649e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5753204144334284
    },
    "sha256": "740d7152366818d98718cdedf8252416735d4083a3f0a8545d8b057302321255",
    "simhash": "1:21465a2cf1c485e2",
    "word_count": 201
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:44:29.378515+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "CARMODY, C. J., and COMPTON, J., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Ray PROCTER and Pauline Procter, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FEZ CLUB, a corporation, Defendant-Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "WOOD, Judge, Court of Appeals.\nThis appeal involves a dismissal under Rule 41(e) (\u00a7 21-1-1(41) (e), N.M.S.A. 1953). The complaint was filed July 20, 1962. The answer was filed August 15, 1962. Plaintiff filed a motion for immediate trial setting on November 13, 1963. Defendant\u2019s motion to dismiss was filed September 1, 1964. The order dismissing under Rule 41(e) was filed December 21, 1964.\nPlaintiffs\u2019 motion to set the case for trial, made prior to defendant\u2019s motion to dismiss, prevents a dismissal under Rule 41(e). Martin v. Leonard Motor-El Paso, 75 N.M. 219, 402 P.2d 954; Foster v. Schwartzman, 75 N.M. 632, 409 P.2d 267; Kennedy v. Nelson, 76 N.M. 299, 414 P.2d 518, decided March 21, 1966.\nThe order of the trial court is reversed. The case is remanded with instructions to reinstate the complaint and to place the cartse on the trial docket.\nIt is so ordered.\nCARMODY, C. J., and COMPTON, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "WOOD, Judge, Court of Appeals."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "McAtee, Toulouse, Marchiondo, Ruud & Gallagher, Albuquerque, for appellants.",
      "Modrall, Seymour, Sperling, Roehl & Harris, Albuquerque, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "414 P.2d 219\nRay PROCTER and Pauline Procter, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FEZ CLUB, a corporation, Defendant-Appellee.\nNo. 7845.\nSupreme Court of New Mexico.\nMay 9, 1966.\nMcAtee, Toulouse, Marchiondo, Ruud & Gallagher, Albuquerque, for appellants.\nModrall, Seymour, Sperling, Roehl & Harris, Albuquerque, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0241-01",
  "first_page_order": 273,
  "last_page_order": 273
}