{
  "id": 2804680,
  "name": "Eugene SILVA, Petitioner, v. Harold A. COX, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Silva v. Cox",
  "decision_date": "1966-11-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 8273",
  "first_page": "145",
  "last_page": "145",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "77 N.M. 145"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "420 P.2d 131"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M.",
    "id": 8835,
    "name": "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "77 N.M. 55",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        2808383
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/77/0055-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 120,
    "char_count": 1052,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.644,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08458466111344716
    },
    "sha256": "667bd0a71257865f9ccc85260228fcb5a2a7a4caba857673b5fbd411dc98380b",
    "simhash": "1:b517c622876b4b2e",
    "word_count": 178
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:38:38.028708+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Eugene SILVA, Petitioner, v. Harold A. COX, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION\nPER CURIAM..\nIn this original habeas corpus action, petitioner seeks his release from the New Mexico State Penitentiary following his return as a parole violator.\nPetitioner makes two contentions, (1) that he did not have counsel at the revocation hearing, and (2) that the allegations relied itpon by the Parole Board did not constitute a valid basis for revocation of parole.\nBoth of these contentions are laid at rest in Robinson v. Cox, 77 N.M. 55, 419 P.2d 253, decided October 17, 1966. We find nothing in the record before us to indicate that the Parole Board acted other than properly in revoking the petitioner\u2019s parole.\nThe writ of habeas corpus should be discharged and the petitioner remanded to the custody of the warden of the New Mexico State Penitentiary. It is so ordered.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM.."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Edward T. Johnson, Santa Fe, for petitioner.",
      "Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Paul J. Lacy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "420 P.2d 131\nEugene SILVA, Petitioner, v. Harold A. COX, Respondent.\nNo. 8273.\nSupreme Court of New Mexico.\nNov. 14, 1966.\nEdward T. Johnson, Santa Fe, for petitioner.\nBoston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Paul J. Lacy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0145-01",
  "first_page_order": 177,
  "last_page_order": 177
}