{
  "id": 2805604,
  "name": "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesse R. BREWER, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Brewer",
  "decision_date": "1967-05-08",
  "docket_number": "No. 8184",
  "first_page": "763",
  "last_page": "764",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "77 N.M. 763"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "427 P.2d 272"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.M.",
    "id": 8835,
    "name": "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 52,
    "name_long": "New Mexico",
    "name": "N.M."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "74 N.M. 717",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.M.",
      "case_ids": [
        2801147
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nm/74/0717-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 153,
    "char_count": 1413,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.651,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.774934982592935e-08,
      "percentile": 0.36068840306905925
    },
    "sha256": "4327fa746c0e2648ab082a070ab712ea89b4b4434c011469dacc41b985ff40c6",
    "simhash": "1:25d7fc8250b75526",
    "word_count": 239
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:38:38.028708+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "CHAVEZ, C. J., and NOBLE, J., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesse R. BREWER, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OPINION\nHENSLEY, Jr., Chief Judge, Court of Appeals.\nIn March, 1966, Jesse R. Brewer filed a motion permitted under \u00a7 21-1-1(93), N.M. S.A., 1953, to vacate the judgment and sentence previously imposed in the district court at Tucumcari. After a hearing the sentencing court entered an order denying the motion. This appeal followed.\nThe appellant seeks a reversal of the order of the lower court on the ground that the appellant had not been fully advised of the legal effect of his prior plea of guilty in the court of the committing magistrate. The question presented involves neither jurisdiction nor fundamental error. The objection was not included in the motion presented to the sentencing court and it is now sought to be raised for the first time. The many decisions touching this procedure need not be listed here. The following references will suffice: \u00a7 21-2-1(20) (1), N.M.S.A., 1953; Batchelor v. Charley, 74 N.M. 717, 398 P.2d 49. No ruling on the point having been invoked in the sentencing court, none will be made here.\nThe order appealed from will be affirmed.\nIt is so ordered.\nCHAVEZ, C. J., and NOBLE, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "HENSLEY, Jr., Chief Judge, Court of Appeals."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Joseph A. Roberts, Santa Fe, for appellant.",
      "Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Gary O. O\u2019Dowd, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "427 P.2d 272\nSTATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesse R. BREWER, Defendant-Appellant.\nNo. 8184.\nSupreme Court of New Mexico.\nMay 8, 1967.\nJoseph A. Roberts, Santa Fe, for appellant.\nBoston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Gary O. O\u2019Dowd, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0763-01",
  "first_page_order": 795,
  "last_page_order": 796
}